From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-333226-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2731 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2012 14:27:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 2714 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2012 14:27:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:27:43 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e51so324371eek.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:27:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=rHQXpunxRXrtrJNGPbSy7syYDMx6biS9G5tgNSIpJEU=;        b=YrMbV2mcB4P4I816i3I8gszQARi7egUosYUV+C4icOOJTNPKLdUyLvXlScc3ADa5mZ         6Oj9SaKgNoiplSNfjG0+p4AF8EA94NG8ao8gApLAEh6+nLRCIE5iE/mODbg3OgYP6QCt         wgJdjMmhIAE2s+XQV8vbL64/AvgiemoqYfTwtOlIh0CF/t6dEkUVRx53zK5/f9mncaqR         FOs6POfXtGfcYGKva6Tcn0zevHScTdw6zVXwGZRq/fmw4CnRI3pIabm4aCCTILSpEWhW         6dIUTGdJZXKpvOdqcg/29hXnuXQAA3cE6Y5TrsXKcINw00HbmibCvkjKOBaG9WcNisVe         8b5w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.211.135 with SMTP id w7mr5320104eeo.4.1354285661802; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:27:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.161.9 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:27:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20663.60390.66132.570663@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <yjt2vccu621d.fsf@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>	<CAD_=9DRPZuNtkTsYvVRbs6hK4xyCcVDNmJGhWgHzynDvTeSfpQ@mail.gmail.com>	<20663.60390.66132.570663@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAD_=9DRsazPFmH5HZf-_NL66crcng3xgx1GGhLxsGX7wz6JuxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA 7/8] validate_failures.py: New options --manifest_subdir, --manifest_name
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnf6vZ3yL6PHJ3Pf/nXpqgwk6Pe2AkkyraAYbTcwDH33S1fO8KkHCN6S+JdoaOa0kgAsR3L+7p6vyYzej0PhI6vehyl8DoX2s/k7qCbqIvQG3wq/s5STbfS86JmIadMu618+JqR9i4PKr8IGQ1Hxjrxj+zhEgMM7nyYO09oKKB/xLjBta/oQCysn3F38OlKolm9wf1f
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02548.txt.bz2

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> Diego Novillo writes:
>  > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>  > > Hi.
>  > > This seventh patch adds new options --manifest_subdir, --manifest_name.
>  > > Useful when using validate_failures.py with a different tool, instead of gcc.
>  > >
>  > > Ok to check in?
>  > >
>  > > 2012-11-24  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
>  > >
>  > >         * testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: New options --manifest_subdir,
>  > >         --manifest_name.
>  >
>  > OK.
>
> This is another baby-steps kinda patch.
> Instead of adding --manifest_{subdir,name},
> this patch just parameterizes the gcc-specific manifest subdir,
> and provides a utility to compute the manifest path.
>
> Ok to check in?
>
> 2012-11-29  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
>
>         * testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: Add function
>         GetManifestPath.  New global _MANIFEST_SUBDIR.

OK.


Diego.