From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335993-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7702 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2013 13:49:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 7692 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2013 13:49:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f46.google.com) (74.125.83.46)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:48:36 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e49so197301eek.19        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:48:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=epeZixkxVplgnrHJ6x+9DZfUrYbViD0wSsB0cjB0G/A=;        b=Aa0UIUZ3O3BG9+YO/ShzM4ANWYz6QG4Rvdam0G8NvwVg7LoFw/k/msPEfup3qffM8H         WnTdM+35n0b243KnXCX9zrHuKhhIrTUspSANOXG6f9norkV/hK0wus6EXrJqvJbGObGR         M3yZ1QrA8sIXyiPcDGVIqCVJrQT212TurrJ55ILH9Ym9avG2zBLRHcrUNtCrddaCano4         s1gdE+uBc5RYDuJR+KLydJdV1Galy5REOTmiix9LX7uAuajlfMgKiV+p+YqvnX/1Kd/R         nPizcoFFYa854UGmAR3WrxWTnHqQzrbTxqHgPEf7VsHaRzRrnIJ7M3NSVkPhA7ssO5UJ         rSow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.177.1 with SMTP id c1mr18175891eem.8.1359121715114; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.201.129 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:48:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdSzFtveK1pNdMHY9yjCEva97Lo0LYpZQA+ccuV4s_RYEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ye6qy5fjcd5y.fsf@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1301241952370.3737@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>	<CAH6eHdSzFtveK1pNdMHY9yjCEva97Lo0LYpZQA+ccuV4s_RYEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:49:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAD_=9DTwrBx=67Fb03hmpv5STSJFWOo+bdyyWFLLuLoOTof3_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [google gcc-4_7, integration] Scribble on destructed strings to catch invalid accesses.
From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9+BL/+QYJ32gBl473q5x/kjGcpjQb8xe8PkBQ9xRoA/nX/ANc2IcOJXdg7tJH4Di6AvDHRT/KZizwnwO2ek2HXjPQYDNw8ekCVMBpu9Or7ua7zZfyhrSHzlubOs8xVEGx7PDXwPTNLyc6fG5J1vehGk8zoLVi/e4dyJMDuLzqgXG2tto0lTnwhcsw+hwxrT+xcyKG
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01236.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Googlers, please include the libstdc++ list on patches to the
> libstdc++ code, even if it's only to a google branch. I don't read
> gcc-patches but am still interested in the changes you make to the
> code on your branch.

Thanks Jonathan.  We'll do.


Diego.