From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-407883-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32209 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2015 22:53:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32190 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2015 22:53:21 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f182.google.com
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f182.google.com) (209.85.214.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:53:20 +0000
Received: by obbbh8 with SMTP id bh8so70831469obb.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=PG1KhGb4rhEJeVtjp3/E9w3Prx1stPX98GVA2i7J14I=;        b=Q7JxnBE4+V28P8dRW2t32jsp+nK4CagfnomQAeRegwqm2tFQZCio6JeFvRg+PxUzVi         Rf7QnJnyaMCCv+Z0286ssz+KO4DalPXM3KLsw77SqfVNiBLG+d4NOCB6Jb8KWvGHKSdx         vk7AK6SBOrcizLrAP1wLusWHSuTBnQmjlK8lsTBf/PwQn8ewPXOKlLpdeUEEAj0B9ROa         J73wzT00VAKYvyk4HSILwGGqg0XxLtv9GAEUP+IstwfxFjlROvLKzgK+CdwusHaCICtg         IUFZBOWLm7Yz0D1CHCM/uanyBCz9FXixYit5PCHT6ihfhdeEnbRDb05yVzud5AkcWVrb         R6yA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJD7Tsum8UZz0nRcnmF5PpkwRfDKJb5t/LjhFXTPIqX8ydCobGrHBzI6uHb2MAxuR/Rf3a
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.62.103 with SMTP id x7mr5453745oer.39.1442789598508; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.60.195 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnVucB4xB-4AgQKCnhsbTFuy68zrXaM3jkYrTN0gHS_xZ3E6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnVucBy-31ETtJW9K20u_Q=7fhmFjh1gL7daH_+y=JoJ0hxyg@mail.gmail.com>	<55E611D3.90704@redhat.com>	<20150902120917.GB6869@kam.mff.cuni.cz>	<CADnVucB4xB-4AgQKCnhsbTFuy68zrXaM3jkYrTN0gHS_xZ3E6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 23:55:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CADnVucCSBmJemNkxt_RK+1E6wToDB71WuEDz2cSX7RqqokJHGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM, Callgraph] Fix PR67280: function incorrectly marked as nothrow
From: Charles Baylis <charles.baylis@linaro.org>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>, 	Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01508.txt.bz2

On 7 September 2015 at 09:35, Charles Baylis <charles.baylis@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> >gcc/ChangeLog:
>>> >
>>> >2015-08-28  Charles Baylis  <charles.baylis@linaro.org>
>>> >
>>> >         * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::create_wrapper): Set can_throw_external
>>> >         in new callgraph edge.
>
> Committed to trunk as r227407.
>
> Are you happy for me to backport to gcc-5-branch?

Hi Jan,

I'd still like to backport this patch to gcc 5. Is that OK

Thanks
Charles