Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] PR63870 Add qualifiers for NEON builtins

[Charles Baylis <charles.baylis@linaro.org>]

On 12 October 2015 at 11:58, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com> wrote:
> On 07/10/15 00:59, charles.baylis@linaro.org wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
>
> ...
>>
>>               case NEON_ARG_MEMORY:
>>               /* Check if expand failed.  */
>>               if (op[argc] == const0_rtx)
>>               {
>> -               va_end (ap);
>>                 return 0;
>>               }
>
>
> ...and drop the braces?

Will do.

>> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
>> index 02f5dc3..448cde3 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
>> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
>> @@ -30117,4 +30117,5 @@ arm_sched_fusion_priority (rtx_insn *insn, int
>> max_pri,
>>     *pri = tmp;
>>     return;
>>   }
>> +
>>   #include "gt-arm.h"
>
>
> This looks unrelated (and is the only change to arm.c) - perhaps commit
> separately? (Note I am not a maintainer! But this looks "obvious"...)

It doesn't seem very useful. I'll drop it.

>> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
>> index 87c9f90..27ac4dc 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
>> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
>> @@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ extern void
>> (*arm_lang_output_object_attributes_hook)(void);
>>   #define TARGET_BPABI false
>>   #endif
>>
>> +#define ENDIAN_LANE_N(mode, n)  \
>> +  (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_NUNITS (mode) - 1 - n : n)
>> +
>
>
> Given we are making changes here to how this all works on bigendian, have
> you tested armeb at all?

I tested on big endian, and it passes, except for a testsuite issue
with the *_f16 tests, which fail because they are built without the
fp16 options on big endian. This is because
check_effective_target_arm_neon_fp16_ok_nocache gets an ICE when it
attempts to compile the test program. I think those fp16 intrinsics
are in your area, do you want to take a look? :)

Thanks for the review

Charles