I'm checking in this patch, which should fix the remaining issues:

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new1.C   (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new1.C:10:20: warning: requested alignment 64 is larger than 16 [-Wattributes]
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new1.C   execution test
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C    (test for warnings, line 11)
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C   (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C:3:20: warning: requested alignment 64 is larger than 16 [-Wattributes]
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C:4:20: warning: requested alignment 64 is larger than 16 [-Wattributes]
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new5.C  -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> aligned-new5.C:(.text+0xe): undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int, std::align_val_t)'
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."