On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Bernd Edlinger
<bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
> On 10/08/16 19:40, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Bernd Edlinger
>> <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
>>> On 09/29/16 22:38, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Bernd Edlinger
>>>> <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
>>>>> Unfortunately, without that exception there is a false positive:
>>>>>
>>>>> In file included from ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/decl.c:30:0:
>>>>> ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/decl.c: In function 'int
>>>>> adjust_packed(tree, tree, int)':
>>>>> ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.h:1874:22: error: << on signed integer in
>>>>> boolean context [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
>>>>>          ? ((unsigned)1) << ((NODE)->type_common.align - 1) : 0)
>>>>>            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>
>>>> Ah, this issue again: the shift isn't in boolean context, it's in
>>>> integer context.  I think we want to be a lot more conservative about
>>>> these warnings in the arms of a COND_EXPR.  In fact, I think the
>>>> entire
>>>>
>>>>         /* Distribute the conversion into the arms of a COND_EXPR.  */
>>>>
>>>> section is wrong now that we're doing delayed folding.
>>>
>>> Could you take care of this ?
>>
>> Done thus:
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> But I have one question:
>
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c
> @@ -2253,6 +2253,15 @@ cp_fold (tree x)
>         op1 = cp_fold (TREE_OPERAND (x, 1));
>         op2 = cp_fold (TREE_OPERAND (x, 2));
>
> +      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (x)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE)
> +       {
> +         warning_sentinel (warn_int_in_bool_context);
>
>
> Yes, it compiles, but ...
> how can this compile at all?
>
> Doesn't it miss a name of a local?
> like warning_sentinel c (warn_int_in_bool_context);

Oops, yes, thanks.  What I wrote is an expression that creates a
temporary warning_sentinel that is then immediately destroyed.

Jason