public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Remove resolved TODO comment
@ 2019-05-23  8:45 Jonathan Wakely
  2019-05-23 13:14 ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2019-05-23  8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Jason Merrill, Ville Voutilainen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 209 bytes --]

	* init.c (std_placement_new_fn_p): Remove outdated TODO comment that
	was resolved by r254694.

Committing to trunk as obvious.

Should I bother doing the same thing on the branches where this was
resolved?


[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 742 bytes --]

commit 31b5063cfade07089e5856ecf0f08d5f7bef65f9
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu May 23 09:42:51 2019 +0100

    Remove resolved TODO comment
    
            * init.c (std_placement_new_fn_p): Remove outdated TODO comment that
            was resolved by r254694.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c
index 4ffd96eef9d..b206263f23c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
@@ -2848,8 +2848,7 @@ malloc_alignment ()
 }
 
 /* Determine whether an allocation function is a namespace-scope
-   non-replaceable placement new function. See DR 1748.
-   TODO: Enable in all standard modes.  */
+   non-replaceable placement new function. See DR 1748.  */
 static bool
 std_placement_new_fn_p (tree alloc_fn)
 {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Remove resolved TODO comment
  2019-05-23  8:45 [PATCH] Remove resolved TODO comment Jonathan Wakely
@ 2019-05-23 13:14 ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2019-05-23 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: gcc-patches List, Ville Voutilainen

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:45 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>         * init.c (std_placement_new_fn_p): Remove outdated TODO comment that
>         was resolved by r254694.
>
> Committing to trunk as obvious.
>
> Should I bother doing the same thing on the branches where this was
> resolved?

I wouldn't bother, no.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-23 13:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-23  8:45 [PATCH] Remove resolved TODO comment Jonathan Wakely
2019-05-23 13:14 ` Jason Merrill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).