From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11629 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2019 02:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11620 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2019 02:31:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:455, H*c:alternative X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:31:21 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-f70.google.com (mail-ot1-f70.google.com [209.85.210.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52FAB81F0D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 02:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f70.google.com with SMTP id q16so1528888ota.20 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 19:31:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <68bb270b-fa29-972d-7cc3-790dbcf02767@redhat.com> <20190808192555.GY28284@redhat.com> <20190815213456.GS14737@redhat.com> <3bc6420a-b1c4-1be6-aa72-5f27fd768430@redhat.com> <20190816121106.GT14737@redhat.com> <20190818135254.GW14737@redhat.com> <4bdb7ae0-a9d9-28dc-983f-0f04baa7fb1e@redhat.com> <20190819003714.GY14737@redhat.com> <20190819012626.GZ14737@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190819012626.GZ14737@redhat.com> From: Jason Merrill Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/91264 - detect modifying const objects in constexpr To: Marek Polacek Cc: gcc-patches List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg01256.txt.bz2 Ok, thanks. On Sun, Aug 18, 2019, 6:26 PM Marek Polacek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:37:14PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > > Ok if that passes? > > Which it did. >