From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: Tim Song <t.canens.cpp@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH for c++/89024 - ICE with incomplete enum type
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 04:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADzB+2njQNPRifvopH0gVDs5WO0XUE2kTj49ioQOcVoKxu6FOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190125232227.GQ26714@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 6:22 PM Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:14:07PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 1/25/19 12:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:55:55AM -0600, Tim Song wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/24/19 2:16 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > > This test ICEs since r159006 which added
> > > > > >
> > > > > > type = ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE (type);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to type_promotes_to. In this test ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE is null because we
> > > > > > haven't yet parsed '}' of the enum and the underlying type isn't fixed, and
> > > > > > so checking TYPE_UNSIGNED crashed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've added some checks to the test to see if the types seem to be OK; clang++
> > > > > > agrees.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk/8/7?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2019-01-24 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PR c++/89024 - ICE with incomplete enum type.
> > > > > > * cvt.c (type_promotes_to): Check if prom is non-null.
> > > > >
> > > > > 9.6/6: An enumeration whose underlying type is not fixed is an
> > > > > incomplete type from its point of declaration to immediately after the
> > > > > closing } of its enum-specifier, at which point it becomes a complete type.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the conversion is ill-formed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > > But the conversion in the example (in
> > > > decltype(__test_aux<_To1>(declval<_From1>())))
> > > > is in a SFINAE context, so shouldn't it gracefully fall back to the
> > > > `(...)` overload?
> > >
> > > I think so, and clang++ and icc also compile the testcase fine (and we used to
> > > too, before r159006).
> >
> > Absolutely, the conversion being ill-formed means substitution fails, and we
> > reject that candidate. I meant that we shouldn't get as far as
> > type_promotes_to for an incomplete type.
>
> Makes sense. So here's another attempt:
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2019-01-25 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/89024 - ICE with incomplete enum type.
> * call.c (standard_conversion): When converting an
> ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P to an incomplete type, return NULL.
OK.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-27 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 19:19 Marek Polacek
2019-01-24 22:17 ` Jason Merrill
2019-01-25 17:00 ` Tim Song
2019-01-25 17:13 ` Marek Polacek
2019-01-25 17:16 ` Jason Merrill
2019-01-26 1:25 ` Marek Polacek
2019-01-27 4:22 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2019-01-28 9:48 ` Christophe Lyon
2019-01-28 16:37 ` Marek Polacek
2019-01-28 17:01 ` Jason Merrill
2019-01-28 18:11 ` Marek Polacek
2019-01-28 21:52 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADzB+2njQNPRifvopH0gVDs5WO0XUE2kTj49ioQOcVoKxu6FOg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
--cc=t.canens.cpp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).