From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 79179 invoked by alias); 25 May 2015 20:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79168 invoked by uid 89); 25 May 2015 20:17:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:17:38 +0000 Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so80269429wgb.3 for ; Mon, 25 May 2015 13:17:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.133.73 with SMTP id pa9mr28648375wjb.148.1432585054852; Mon, 25 May 2015 13:17:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.180.133 with HTTP; Mon, 25 May 2015 13:16:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150525195650.GY27320@redhat.com> References: <20150525195650.GY27320@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFudWVsIEzDs3Blei1JYsOhw7Fleg==?= Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH c/c++] use explicit locations for some warnings in c-pragma.c To: Marek Polacek Cc: Gcc Patch List , "Joseph S. Myers" , Jason Merrill Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg02269.txt.bz2 On 25 May 2015 at 21:56, Marek Polacek wrote: > Perhaps we should introduce GCC_BAD_LOC with a location_t argument and use it > here. Why would we want to obfuscate code like that? I would propose to actually remove GCC_BAD completely. Manuel.