From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-407929-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28615 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2015 12:27:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28601 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2015 12:27:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f177.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:27:52 +0000
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so143771009wic.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.79.196 with SMTP id l4mr25107731wjx.93.1442838469989; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.186.214 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdteOaCbdvTUf7znNvJVPV+3ADNtSAfZe1N+Rkm1zdBmvSHEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAESRpQAss9wY48rxjsVC_VHn5c2bC+ZKf4m6fvL-ZNVFLkmKEA@mail.gmail.com> <20150525195650.GY27320@redhat.com> <CAESRpQA=V4JmGTzOmJxgjCe+_mUMXdhMMVBnuGiDeW8LxOYi5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOYY1O50YLv7URgXX1Yiht=VPJvgT6Z8p2k6bUrDfb6pCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAESRpQCe5=ih8-kw-kMg7v+rxLHbfdr3VtGAfbyyPFJ=Fez+aQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOb0ZsF26pctO+ObqoqEXZmCHk2cwjnQvX5K9BRYRrtH5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAESRpQCA152OU=ejAq_JN2uzArKAMxR0DX_gGAUCjvo+JvWwAg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOa0O4zczPTcsbgAOvjH9f+NLit-0-KGqKN-g1snDcfnjA@mail.gmail.com> <CAESRpQDqG3U5P0oX--CegesLtKBY4yYH6aDWHesvGQMabhYmtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOaCbdvTUf7znNvJVPV+3ADNtSAfZe1N+Rkm1zdBmvSHEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFudWVsIEzDs3Blei1JYsOhw7Fleg==?= <lopezibanez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAESRpQAU=0Ftb48Ux_N+Mg_7pLW=waLXi4kb9LyerKQPOwmDQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH c/c++] use explicit locations for some warnings in c-pragma.c
To: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01554.txt.bz2

On 21 September 2015 at 06:52, Christophe Lyon
<christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
> It looks like I mis-applied your patch.
> I cleaned up and re-applied it, and I can confirm it fixes the problem.

Committed as obvious as r227967.

Thanks,

Manuel.