From: "Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,
Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: ping: [gcc patch] libcc1: '@' GDB array operator
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 07:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAESRpQBK-DgFLe+NM6OrVZ3LuRMH50XyTwHu4XM6wJaQvKks_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150603205742.GA5676@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On 3 June 2015 at 22:58, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> In general parsing LHS vs. RHS is not so trivial:
> *array1@10
> expression wrapped into ->
> (*array2+"a@c"[1]+'@'+'\''@(*array1@10)[5])[2]
>
Is this a real case? I cannot understand what this means, but it could
simply be that I'm only familiar with the most basic uses of @
together with 'print'.
In any case, any option is better than no implementation, the decision
is not up to me, and I don't have the time to implement the
alternative I propose myself.
Cheers,
Manuel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 16:36 Jan Kratochvil
2015-04-17 15:17 ` ping: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-30 8:33 ` Jeff Law
2015-05-30 12:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-31 19:52 ` [gcc patchv2] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-03 15:09 ` ping: [gcc patch] " Jeff Law
2015-06-03 15:34 ` Tom Tromey
2015-06-03 16:31 ` Jeff Law
2015-06-03 18:38 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2015-06-03 18:55 ` Tom Tromey
2015-06-03 21:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-04 7:36 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez [this message]
2015-06-04 8:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-04 8:42 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2015-06-04 8:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-04 9:15 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-06-04 13:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-04 14:03 ` Jeff Law
2015-06-04 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-06-04 14:43 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAESRpQBK-DgFLe+NM6OrVZ3LuRMH50XyTwHu4XM6wJaQvKks_w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lopezibanez@gmail.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).