From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-407887-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 60860 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2015 00:25:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 60851 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2015 00:25:00 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f171.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:24:59 +0000
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so94719733wic.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.85.164 with SMTP id i4mr10847929wiz.54.1442795096815; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.186.214 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdteOb0ZsF26pctO+ObqoqEXZmCHk2cwjnQvX5K9BRYRrtH5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAESRpQAss9wY48rxjsVC_VHn5c2bC+ZKf4m6fvL-ZNVFLkmKEA@mail.gmail.com> <20150525195650.GY27320@redhat.com> <CAESRpQA=V4JmGTzOmJxgjCe+_mUMXdhMMVBnuGiDeW8LxOYi5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOYY1O50YLv7URgXX1Yiht=VPJvgT6Z8p2k6bUrDfb6pCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAESRpQCe5=ih8-kw-kMg7v+rxLHbfdr3VtGAfbyyPFJ=Fez+aQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOb0ZsF26pctO+ObqoqEXZmCHk2cwjnQvX5K9BRYRrtH5A@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFudWVsIEzDs3Blei1JYsOhw7Fleg==?= <lopezibanez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:29:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAESRpQCA152OU=ejAq_JN2uzArKAMxR0DX_gGAUCjvo+JvWwAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH c/c++] use explicit locations for some warnings in c-pragma.c
To: Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01512.txt.bz2

On 21 September 2015 at 02:22, Christophe Lyon
<christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
> It works for me if I replace 24 by 62.

Wierd. What is the actual output of the compiler?