From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=YdYP=4A=gmail.com=creatorsmithmdt@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6E13858D39
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2022 10:38:14 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1F6E13858D39
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id a16so5892431edb.9
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 02:38:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=PrtlNDofUUb/z0uEp94Ex/1G/luWBaLRWXOqGd10iBs=;
        b=kvZb4W5JTR4EaIbGPOeM+pKuXXBz2z6RC1hKDdszqll0ERxclNZBgdyKyca2eoeiUA
         Ar/2/tFHGSZV7CeE+xQwBP6LsWVpmGYGvLctjJ237Xx2iOl66P6S0d/RtiQmeQQa/e0r
         bzZsVAutRgAkF617R/TRJJQ0zCg4e3CGpweuNDwi3MDxe+iXiAsnx1dORV6vjiRsvxzP
         kChbWPVZ8PajHp/onPwfM5fmvtW6bMA/RK8W4blkAOWAOb3mSURGkgNBd8i6zqA2oOvI
         +8cXCM/vHJgUrPu/T2rTzkDmgWB5V1jX0vD4vJhf2Q54O4f4zefVoer8I89D1P48/Q6K
         f1Og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=PrtlNDofUUb/z0uEp94Ex/1G/luWBaLRWXOqGd10iBs=;
        b=H7ZC6LfWW38kwrOy9Gs07Ct1yuY5Arq+T/HI91Ym/4tKtlKM8pyjZqDn3zC06ZB6Pj
         UwZaMLrWXhNSWfwMe/UQMlecJh3XWDL8C/1DXpnf/zJD5vNJElPg/RRJytL/jbHo31id
         bwJcxKrqWBErzYDXpO4k5aHieHoVPka6Cyvv8AG44Qo3Myu3+zTJ3Jldqp/f3QNofkzD
         UFb4pUaSJac+kXFU2Pipkdy857E07JiFguYEpmtPY7NCteF3WXQFbTlfJ440POx+2PkO
         g9r561ektaHdeOK6hZIdSbDR/2c/Jk2Qs7O1DbP98uIizzCYrANgVUvfsP9Ajcr0TxNZ
         gG0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plc2ShWdqFkiCnMdVvNcfei2nr6VvMq/cx5Yas7kq+1nZrmmCNk
	7DtYOv3SKeLeGnOO54f/1hwwmxmbkaBSF46Kq9E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5ZLyNxRfB2+m+dlJUq2eX0Yu7i7RgEuvTf2jBgyyPMSMUUe0P/k6kpjQwrZ/cQzC0qqBHOEijMvUXiFsYjcs0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:143:b0:463:f8aa:d2bf with SMTP id
 s3-20020a056402014300b00463f8aad2bfmr64230597edu.358.1669977492656; Fri, 02
 Dec 2022 02:38:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEYL+X_ta9=7wKrWZT7TArBiOi79S2WzTtsqOwueUf8Vm2cjvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8FF347A1-0569-4A57-B0AE-9760A70AA010@gmail.com> <CAEYL+X9rNbOHanPNrYmtGHXMD2NhCWRiyTXkzG=YxOPRZBAUvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+=Sn1njXotzb_bkfZOOhd9MDUEqvLwLS2KCVyFsQ4thWwZTtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEYL+X_dJfJ4gRjUgKnx3TdaqZEWSRV+GBvS4jYeO4Tntya9tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc0b9YXc4smF9Vkzqb2qVBiM2DWCnTRj7P6FYy5RHYhq4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEYL+X9mQNwWUr1k8g2LTxG3_NfgMFa-fz3NMcVNeMqARpSv1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFiYyc1=y7iy-RpBsq301R_72kAeY=En4sUrWTLHqxULTz0fQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc0cLi33mo9MWFSxh6zXD4iU7=gzUH++cD8GUrsQ7iNpFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc0cLi33mo9MWFSxh6zXD4iU7=gzUH++cD8GUrsQ7iNpFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zopolis0 <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 21:38:03 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEYL+X9REHFOcg7vjSB34zCQ62dqRdFC_X_sLUD5N3A_wnOrfw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/56] Revert "Move void_list_node init to common code". (8ff2a92a0450243e52d3299a13b30f208bafa7e0)
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

Ok, well following that logic it should work to just remove the
void_list_node definition that java uses, as per 8ff2a92. However, it
doesn't, so clearly java does something else to the end_params_node
definition that it shouldn't be, or something similar. I'll have a
look.