From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
To: JonY <10walls@gmail.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 10:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEwic4baSqC5cL2Z1sFXN+HjXerLnJHY6j8r2tZAQ2YPgkX=qA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc2fc7a6-a391-dca3-c42a-6184276699fd@gmail.com>
2017-05-02 12:21 GMT+02:00 JonY <10walls@gmail.com>:
> On 05/01/2017 11:31 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> All of patches are concerned with 64-bit Microsoft ABI functions that call
>>> System V ABI function which clobbers RSI, RDI and XMM6-15 and are aimed at
>>> improving performance and .text size of Wine 64. I had previously submitted
>>> these as separate patch sets, but have combined them for simplicity. (Does
>>> this make the ChangeLogs too big? Please let me know if you want me to break
>>> these back apart.) Below are the included patchsets and a summary of changes
>>> since the previous post(s):
>>
>> Well, the ChangeLog is acceptable.
>>
>> I have comments on how new RTX patterns are generated and checked
>> (patches 9/12 and 11/12). Other patches look good to me, so after
>> issues with 9/12 and 11/12 are resolved, I think the patch set is
>> ready to go.
>>
>> After the above issue is addressed, I propose to move forward by
>> committing the patchset, and resolve any possible issues later. There
>> are just too many code paths in the stack frame construction and
>> teardown to notice all possible interactions between new and old code.
>> It looks that existing code won't be affected without activating new
>> option, so we can be a bit less cautious with the patchset. An
>> important part is thus a comprehensive added test suite, which seems
>> to pass.
>>
>> I also assume that Cygwin and MinGW people agree with the patch and
>> the functionality itself.
>>
>> Uros.
>>
>
> Cygwin and MinGW does not use SysV/MS transitions directly in their own
> code, changes should be OK.
>
>
>
Right, and Wine people will tell, if something doesn't work for them.
So ok for me too.
Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 8:05 Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] [i386] Add ms2sysv pro/epilogue stubs to libgcc Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout for -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] [i386] Re-align stack frame prior to SSE saves Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] [i386,testsuite] Test program for ms to sysv abi function calls Daniel Santos
2017-05-17 9:52 ` Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] [i386] Add remainder of -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues implementation Daniel Santos
2017-05-04 22:11 ` [PATCH 11/12 rev1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] [i386] Add patterns and predicates foutline-msabi-xlouges Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:18 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 22:19 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03 6:17 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-03 7:38 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03 8:38 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-04 21:35 ` [PATCH 09/12 rev1] [i386] Add patterns and predicates mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] [i386] Use re-aligned stack pointer for aligned SSE movs Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] [i386] Add option -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-28 6:00 ` Sandra Loosemore
2017-04-28 7:37 ` [PATCH 05/12 rev 1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] [i386] Keep stack pointer valid after after re-alignment Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:23 ` [PATCH 04/12] [i386] Minor refactoring Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] [i386] Modify ix86_save_reg to optionally omit stub-managed registers Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 8:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] [i386] Add class xlogue_layout and new fields to struct machine_function Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 18:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/12 GCC8] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/12] " Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 10:25 ` JonY
2017-05-02 10:45 ` Kai Tietz [this message]
2017-05-03 6:01 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-05 9:05 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-06 20:41 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-08 20:07 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03 4:32 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-13 0:01 ` [PING] " Daniel Santos
2017-05-13 18:29 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-13 23:43 ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-14 10:25 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-07-26 19:03 ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-27 0:36 ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 13:51 ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 14:41 ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-31 10:25 ` Daniel Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEwic4baSqC5cL2Z1sFXN+HjXerLnJHY6j8r2tZAQ2YPgkX=qA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
--cc=10walls@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).