From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18566 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2012 12:53:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 18554 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jul 2012 12:53:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:53:06 +0000 Received: by weyr6 with SMTP id r6so259310wey.20 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:53:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.113.4 with SMTP id z4mr1215592weg.201.1342529585302; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.16.21 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:53:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50055D09.5000205@redhat.com> References: <17C1EDE6-6479-4C93-AD30-1930864B3729@adacore.com> <50044132.60906@redhat.com> <66B66CEA-F2C6-4838-B5EB-62963E52C7DF@adacore.com> <50055D09.5000205@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch/RFC] SEH exceptions for Win64 From: Kai Tietz To: Richard Henderson Cc: Tristan Gingold , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2 2012/7/17 Richard Henderson : > On 07/17/2012 12:35 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> So, the first element of ExceptionInformation will be exc. >> >> Should I add a comment ? > > Ah right. Definitely. > > Otherwise I don't see anything else in the way. Kai? > > > r~ No, I don't have any objections. I just tested the patch myself with full regression-test. So patch is ok. Thanks, Kai