public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rong Xu <xur@google.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, davidxl@google.com, pinskia@gmail.com,
		reply@codereview.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: atomic update of profile counters (issue7000044)
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF1bQ=Qs8uSHmPp01vwYm-vU4XD+wYrB4cEAcAib8i7LDAS3og@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1bQ=R7pXzBq08E7PiXKwahpM8Lx0gergnXvGtr6wk+M8-nKA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Honza,

In the other thread of discussion (similar patch in google-4_7
branch), you said you were thinking if to let this patch into trunk in
stage 3. Can you give some update?

Thanks,

-Rong

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Rong Xu <xur@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds support of atomic update of profiles counters. The goal is to improve
>>> the poor counter values for highly thread programs.
>>>
>>> The atomic update is under a new option -fprofile-gen-atomic=<N>
>>> N=0: default, no atomic update
>>> N=1: atomic update edge counters.
>>> N=2: atomic update some of value profile counters (currently indirect-call and one value profile).
>>> N=3: both edge counter and the above value profile counters.
>>> Other value: fall back to the default.
>>>
>>> This patch is a simple porting of the version in google-4_7 branch. It uses __atomic_fetch_add
>>> based on Andrew Pinski's suggestion. Note I did not apply to all the value profiles as
>>> the indirect-call profile is the most relevant one here.
>>>
>>> Test with bootstrap.
>>>
>>> Comments and suggestions are welcomed.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Rong
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012-12-20  Rong Xu  <xur@google.com>
>>>
>>>       * libgcc/libgcov.c (__gcov_one_value_profiler_body_atomic): New
>>>         function. Atomic update profile counters.
>>>       (__gcov_one_value_profiler_atomic): Ditto.
>>>       (__gcov_indirect_call_profiler_atomic): Ditto.
>>>       * gcc/gcov-io.h: Macros for atomic update.
>>>       * gcc/common.opt: New option.
>>>       * gcc/tree-profile.c (gimple_init_edge_profiler): Atomic
>>>         update profile counters.
>>>       (gimple_gen_edge_profiler): Ditto.
>>
>> The patch looks resonable.  Eventually we probably should provide rest of the value counters
>> in thread safe manner.  What happens on targets not having atomic operations?
>
> From http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html#_005f_005fsync-Builtins,
> it says:
>       "If a particular operation cannot be implemented on the target
> processor, a warning is generated and a call an external function is
> generated. "
>
> So I think there will be a warning and eventually a link error of unsat.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Rong
>
>
>>
>> Honza

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-28 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-21  6:45 Rong Xu
2012-12-21  9:25 ` Jan Hubicka
2012-12-21 18:38   ` Rong Xu
2012-12-28 19:33     ` Rong Xu [this message]
2012-12-28 19:35       ` Xinliang David Li
2013-01-03  1:16         ` Rong Xu
2013-01-03  1:25           ` Andrew Pinski
2013-01-03  1:29             ` Rong Xu
2013-01-03  1:31               ` Andrew Pinski
2013-01-03  9:05             ` Richard Biener
2013-01-04  0:42               ` Rong Xu
2013-01-07 20:36                 ` Richard Henderson
2013-01-07 20:56                   ` Rong Xu
2013-11-20  7:03                     ` Rong Xu
2013-11-20  7:20                       ` Andrew Pinski
2013-11-20 19:59                         ` Rong Xu
2013-11-20 20:08                           ` Andrew Pinski
2013-11-20 20:31                             ` Andrew Pinski
2013-11-20 23:18                           ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-11-21  0:07                             ` Rong Xu
2013-11-21  0:14                               ` Andrew Pinski
2013-11-21  1:24                                 ` Rong Xu
2014-05-26  6:01                       ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAF1bQ=Qs8uSHmPp01vwYm-vU4XD+wYrB4cEAcAib8i7LDAS3og@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=xur@google.com \
    --cc=davidxl@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=reply@codereview.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).