* [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 @ 2012-03-08 21:35 Fabien Chêne 2012-03-12 12:36 ` Dodji Seketeli 2012-03-29 14:11 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabien Chêne @ 2012-03-08 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 756 bytes --] Hi, In the end, I think we need again to strip some USING_DECLs in a couple of places. Tested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK to commit (for whatever appropriate) ? gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012-03-08 Fabien Chêne <fabien@gcc.gnu.org> PR c++/52465 * g++.dg/lookup/using52.C: New. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2012-03-08 Fabien Chêne <fabien@gcc.gnu.org> PR c++/52465 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl. * parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on the target decl. * name-lookup.c (strip_using_decl): Returns NULL_TREE if the decl to be stripped is NULL_TREE. (qualify_lookup): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on the target decl. -- Fabien [-- Attachment #2: pr52465.patch --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 4096 bytes --] Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// { dg-do compile } +// PR c++/52645 + +class A +{ +protected: + struct B {}; +}; + +class C : A +{ +protected: + using A::B; + + struct D : public B {}; +}; Index: gcc/cp/decl.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 184891) +++ gcc/cp/decl.c (working copy) @@ -8686,6 +8686,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec type = NULL_TREE; type_was_error_mark_node = true; } + + type = strip_using_decl (type); + /* If the entire declaration is itself tagged as deprecated then suppress reports of deprecated items. */ if (type && TREE_DEPRECATED (type) Index: gcc/cp/parser.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 184891) +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy) @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* C++ Parser. Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, - 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Written by Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>. This file is part of GCC. @@ -17734,6 +17734,7 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, bool is_declaration) { tree decl; + tree target_decl; tree scope; bool typename_p; cp_token *token; @@ -17835,6 +17836,8 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, decl = TYPE_NAME (decl); } + target_decl = strip_using_decl (decl); + /* Check to see that it is really the name of a class. */ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (decl, 0)) == IDENTIFIER_NODE @@ -17854,14 +17857,14 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, if (decl != error_mark_node) decl = TYPE_NAME (decl); } - else if (TREE_CODE (decl) != TYPE_DECL - || TREE_TYPE (decl) == error_mark_node - || !MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)) + else if (TREE_CODE (target_decl) != TYPE_DECL + || TREE_TYPE (target_decl) == error_mark_node + || !MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (target_decl)) /* In Objective-C 2.0, a classname followed by '.' starts a dot-syntax expression, and it's not a type-name. */ || (c_dialect_objc () && cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->type == CPP_DOT - && objc_is_class_name (decl))) + && objc_is_class_name (target_decl))) decl = error_mark_node; if (decl == error_mark_node) Index: gcc/cp/name-lookup.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/name-lookup.c (revision 184891) +++ gcc/cp/name-lookup.c (working copy) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* Definitions for C++ name lookup routines. - Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 + Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Contributed by Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ pop_binding (tree id, tree decl) tree strip_using_decl (tree decl) { + if (decl == NULL_TREE) + return NULL_TREE; + while (TREE_CODE (decl) == USING_DECL && !DECL_DEPENDENT_P (decl)) decl = USING_DECL_DECLS (decl); return decl; @@ -4115,9 +4118,13 @@ qualify_lookup (tree val, int flags) return false; if ((flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_NAMESPACES) && TREE_CODE (val) == NAMESPACE_DECL) return true; - if ((flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES) - && (TREE_CODE (val) == TYPE_DECL || TREE_CODE (val) == TEMPLATE_DECL)) - return true; + if (flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES) + { + tree target_val = strip_using_decl (val); + if (TREE_CODE (target_val) == TYPE_DECL + || TREE_CODE (target_val) == TEMPLATE_DECL) + return true; + } if (flags & (LOOKUP_PREFER_NAMESPACES | LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES)) return false; /* Look through lambda things that we shouldn't be able to see. */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-03-08 21:35 [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne @ 2012-03-12 12:36 ` Dodji Seketeli 2012-03-12 16:19 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-03-29 14:11 ` Jason Merrill 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dodji Seketeli @ 2012-03-12 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabien Chêne; +Cc: Jason Merrill, GCC Patches Hello Fabien, Fabien Chêne <fabien.chene@gmail.com> a écrit: [...] > Index: gcc/cp/decl.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 184891) > +++ gcc/cp/decl.c (working copy) > @@ -8686,6 +8686,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec > type = NULL_TREE; > type_was_error_mark_node = true; > } > + > + type = strip_using_decl (type); > + I am a little bit curious as to why this change is necessary. It seems to me that the test case of your patch would pass even without this change, wouldn't it? Thanks. -- Dodji ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-03-12 12:36 ` Dodji Seketeli @ 2012-03-12 16:19 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-04-07 15:38 ` Fabien Chêne 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabien Chêne @ 2012-03-12 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GCC Patches; +Cc: Jason Merrill Salut Dodji, 2012/3/12 Dodji Seketeli <dodji@seketeli.org>: [...] >> Index: gcc/cp/decl.c >> =================================================================== >> --- gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 184891) >> +++ gcc/cp/decl.c (working copy) >> @@ -8686,6 +8686,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec >> type = NULL_TREE; >> type_was_error_mark_node = true; >> } >> + >> + type = strip_using_decl (type); >> + > > I am a little bit curious as to why this change is necessary. It seems > to me that the test case of your patch would pass even without this > change, wouldn't it? Yes, this testcase would pass, but an existing testcase wouldn't. I don't remeber which one, but I think it was related to using declarations that refer to a typedef. struct A { typedef int T; }; stuct B : A { using B::T; }; -- Fabien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-03-12 16:19 ` Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-07 15:38 ` Fabien Chêne 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-07 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GCC Patches, Dodji Seketeli; +Cc: Jason Merrill 2012/3/12 Fabien Chêne <fabien.chene@gmail.com>: > Salut Dodji, > > 2012/3/12 Dodji Seketeli <dodji@seketeli.org>: > [...] >>> Index: gcc/cp/decl.c >>> =================================================================== >>> --- gcc/cp/decl.c (revision 184891) >>> +++ gcc/cp/decl.c (working copy) >>> @@ -8686,6 +8686,9 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *dec >>> type = NULL_TREE; >>> type_was_error_mark_node = true; >>> } >>> + >>> + type = strip_using_decl (type); >>> + >> >> I am a little bit curious as to why this change is necessary. It seems >> to me that the test case of your patch would pass even without this >> change, wouldn't it? > > Yes, this testcase would pass, but an existing testcase wouldn't. I > don't remeber which one, but I think it was related to using > declarations that refer to a typedef. > > struct A { typedef int T; }; > stuct B : A { using B::T; }; More precisely, the testcase which was failing is g++.other/using5.C. -- Fabien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-03-08 21:35 [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne 2012-03-12 12:36 ` Dodji Seketeli @ 2012-03-29 14:11 ` Jason Merrill 2012-04-07 15:37 ` Fabien Chêne 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2012-03-29 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabien Chêne; +Cc: GCC Patches On 03/08/2012 04:34 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote: > * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl. I would think we ought to be stripping USING_DECLs at a lower level, when we first look up the name in the parser. They shouldn't make it as far as grokdeclarator. Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-03-29 14:11 ` Jason Merrill @ 2012-04-07 15:37 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-04-07 21:14 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-07 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --] 2012/3/29 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>: > On 03/08/2012 04:34 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote: >> >> * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl. > > > I would think we ought to be stripping USING_DECLs at a lower level, when we > first look up the name in the parser. They shouldn't make it as far as > grokdeclarator. Perhaps it is more correct like that, in cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type ? Bootstrapped/tested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012-04-07 Fabien Chêne <fabien@gcc.gnu.org> PR c++/52465 * g++.dg/lookup/using52.C: New. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2012-04-07 Fabien Chêne <fabien@gcc.gnu.org> PR c++/52465 * parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on the target decl. (cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type): Change its prototype so that the second argument be modifiable, and strip using declarations of that argument. (cp_parser_type_specifier): Adjust the calls to cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type. (cp_parser_simple_type_specifier): Likewise. * name-lookup.c (strip_using_decl): Returns NULL_TREE if the decl to be stripped is NULL_TREE. (qualify_lookup): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on the target decl. -- Fabien [-- Attachment #2: 52465_2.patch --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 7421 bytes --] Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// { dg-do compile } +// PR c++/52645 + +class A +{ +protected: + struct B {}; +}; + +class C : A +{ +protected: + using A::B; + + struct D : public B {}; +}; Index: gcc/cp/parser.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 186167) +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy) @@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ static bool cp_parser_declares_only_clas static void cp_parser_set_storage_class (cp_parser *, cp_decl_specifier_seq *, enum rid, location_t); static void cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type - (cp_decl_specifier_seq *, tree, location_t, bool); + (cp_decl_specifier_seq *, tree *, location_t, bool); static bool cp_parser_friend_p (const cp_decl_specifier_seq *); static void cp_parser_required_error @@ -13335,7 +13335,7 @@ cp_parser_type_specifier (cp_parser* par *declares_class_or_enum = 2; if (decl_specs) cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, - type_spec, + &type_spec, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/true); return type_spec; @@ -13364,7 +13364,7 @@ cp_parser_type_specifier (cp_parser* par *declares_class_or_enum = 2; if (decl_specs) cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, - type_spec, + &type_spec, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/true); return type_spec; @@ -13386,7 +13386,7 @@ cp_parser_type_specifier (cp_parser* par is_declaration)); if (decl_specs) cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, - type_spec, + &type_spec, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); return type_spec; @@ -13579,7 +13579,7 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_pars type = finish_typeof (type); if (decl_specs) - cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, type, + cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, &type, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); @@ -13588,7 +13588,7 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_pars case RID_UNDERLYING_TYPE: type = cp_parser_trait_expr (parser, RID_UNDERLYING_TYPE); if (decl_specs) - cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, type, + cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, &type, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); @@ -13598,7 +13598,7 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_pars case RID_DIRECT_BASES: type = cp_parser_trait_expr (parser, token->keyword); if (decl_specs) - cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, type, + cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, &type, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); return type; @@ -13613,7 +13613,7 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_pars { type = token->u.value; if (decl_specs) - cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, type, + cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, &type, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer); @@ -13630,7 +13630,7 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_pars && token->keyword != RID_SHORT && token->keyword != RID_LONG)) cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, - type, + &type, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); if (decl_specs) @@ -13705,7 +13705,7 @@ cp_parser_simple_type_specifier (cp_pars && !cp_parser_parse_definitely (parser)) type = NULL_TREE; if (type && decl_specs) - cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, type, + cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (decl_specs, &type, token->location, /*type_definition_p=*/false); } @@ -17744,6 +17744,7 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, bool is_declaration) { tree decl; + tree target_decl; tree scope; bool typename_p; cp_token *token; @@ -17845,6 +17846,8 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, decl = TYPE_NAME (decl); } + target_decl = strip_using_decl (decl); + /* Check to see that it is really the name of a class. */ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (decl, 0)) == IDENTIFIER_NODE @@ -17864,14 +17867,14 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, if (decl != error_mark_node) decl = TYPE_NAME (decl); } - else if (TREE_CODE (decl) != TYPE_DECL - || TREE_TYPE (decl) == error_mark_node - || !MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (decl)) + else if (TREE_CODE (target_decl) != TYPE_DECL + || TREE_TYPE (target_decl) == error_mark_node + || !MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (target_decl)) /* In Objective-C 2.0, a classname followed by '.' starts a dot-syntax expression, and it's not a type-name. */ || (c_dialect_objc () && cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer)->type == CPP_DOT - && objc_is_class_name (decl))) + && objc_is_class_name (target_decl))) decl = error_mark_node; if (decl == error_mark_node) @@ -22063,15 +22066,17 @@ cp_parser_set_storage_class (cp_parser * decl_specs->conflicting_specifiers_p = true; } -/* Update the DECL_SPECS to reflect the TYPE_SPEC. If TYPE_DEFINITION_P +/* Update the DECL_SPECS to reflect the TYPE_SPECIFIER. If TYPE_DEFINITION_P is true, the type is a class or enum definition. */ static void cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type (cp_decl_specifier_seq *decl_specs, - tree type_spec, + tree *type_specifier, location_t location, bool type_definition_p) { + tree type_spec = strip_using_decl (*type_specifier); + *type_specifier = type_spec; decl_specs->any_specifiers_p = true; /* If the user tries to redeclare bool, char16_t, char32_t, or wchar_t Index: gcc/cp/name-lookup.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/name-lookup.c (revision 186167) +++ gcc/cp/name-lookup.c (working copy) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* Definitions for C++ name lookup routines. - Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 + Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Contributed by Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ pop_binding (tree id, tree decl) tree strip_using_decl (tree decl) { + if (decl == NULL_TREE) + return NULL_TREE; + while (TREE_CODE (decl) == USING_DECL && !DECL_DEPENDENT_P (decl)) decl = USING_DECL_DECLS (decl); return decl; @@ -4115,9 +4118,13 @@ qualify_lookup (tree val, int flags) return false; if ((flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_NAMESPACES) && TREE_CODE (val) == NAMESPACE_DECL) return true; - if ((flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES) - && (TREE_CODE (val) == TYPE_DECL || TREE_CODE (val) == TEMPLATE_DECL)) - return true; + if (flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES) + { + tree target_val = strip_using_decl (val); + if (TREE_CODE (target_val) == TYPE_DECL + || TREE_CODE (target_val) == TEMPLATE_DECL) + return true; + } if (flags & (LOOKUP_PREFER_NAMESPACES | LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES)) return false; /* Look through lambda things that we shouldn't be able to see. */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-04-07 15:37 ` Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-07 21:14 ` Jason Merrill 2012-04-10 20:23 ` Fabien Chêne 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2012-04-07 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabien Chêne; +Cc: GCC Patches On 04/07/2012 11:37 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote: > Perhaps it is more correct like that, in cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type ? Even that seems late. Why not just return the target decl from cp_parser_class_name? Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-04-07 21:14 ` Jason Merrill @ 2012-04-10 20:23 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-04-11 2:17 ` Jason Merrill 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-10 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1096 bytes --] 2012/4/7 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>: > On 04/07/2012 11:37 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote: >> >> Perhaps it is more correct like that, in cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type ? > > Even that seems late. Why not just return the target decl from > cp_parser_class_name? Ah yes, that's slightly better. (I've kept the NULL check in strip_using_decl, it seems safer to me. Just tell me if you prefer not) Tested x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk and 4.7 ? gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012-03-08 Fabien Chêne <fabien@gcc.gnu.org> PR c++/52465 * g++.dg/lookup/using52.C: New. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2012-03-08 Fabien Chêne <fabien@gcc.gnu.org> PR c++/52465 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl. * parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on the target decl. * name-lookup.c (strip_using_decl): Returns NULL_TREE if the decl to be stripped is NULL_TREE. (qualify_lookup): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on the target decl. -- Fabien [-- Attachment #2: 52465_3.patch --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2308 bytes --] Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/using52.C (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// { dg-do compile } +// PR c++/52645 + +class A +{ +protected: + struct B {}; +}; + +class C : A +{ +protected: + using A::B; + + struct D : public B {}; +}; Index: gcc/cp/parser.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 186167) +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy) @@ -17845,6 +17845,8 @@ cp_parser_class_name (cp_parser *parser, decl = TYPE_NAME (decl); } + decl = strip_using_decl (decl); + /* Check to see that it is really the name of a class. */ if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (decl, 0)) == IDENTIFIER_NODE Index: gcc/cp/name-lookup.c =================================================================== --- gcc/cp/name-lookup.c (revision 186167) +++ gcc/cp/name-lookup.c (working copy) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* Definitions for C++ name lookup routines. - Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 + Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Contributed by Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ pop_binding (tree id, tree decl) tree strip_using_decl (tree decl) { + if (decl == NULL_TREE) + return NULL_TREE; + while (TREE_CODE (decl) == USING_DECL && !DECL_DEPENDENT_P (decl)) decl = USING_DECL_DECLS (decl); return decl; @@ -4115,9 +4118,13 @@ qualify_lookup (tree val, int flags) return false; if ((flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_NAMESPACES) && TREE_CODE (val) == NAMESPACE_DECL) return true; - if ((flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES) - && (TREE_CODE (val) == TYPE_DECL || TREE_CODE (val) == TEMPLATE_DECL)) - return true; + if (flags & LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES) + { + tree target_val = strip_using_decl (val); + if (TREE_CODE (target_val) == TYPE_DECL + || TREE_CODE (target_val) == TEMPLATE_DECL) + return true; + } if (flags & (LOOKUP_PREFER_NAMESPACES | LOOKUP_PREFER_TYPES)) return false; /* Look through lambda things that we shouldn't be able to see. */ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-04-10 20:23 ` Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-11 2:17 ` Jason Merrill 2012-04-12 8:20 ` Fabien Chêne 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jason Merrill @ 2012-04-11 2:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabien Chêne; +Cc: GCC Patches On 04/10/2012 04:23 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote: > Ah yes, that's slightly better. > (I've kept the NULL check in strip_using_decl, it seems safer to me. > Just tell me if you prefer not) > Tested x86_64-unkown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk and 4.7 ? > > 2012-03-08 Fabien Chêne<fabien@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR c++/52465 > * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Call strip_using_decl. > * parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Call strip_using_decl and > perform some checks on the target decl. > * name-lookup.c (strip_using_decl): Returns NULL_TREE if the decl > to be stripped is NULL_TREE. > (qualify_lookup): Call strip_using_decl and perform some checks on > the target decl. Your ChangeLog needs to be adjusted. :) The patch is OK, thanks! Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 2012-04-11 2:17 ` Jason Merrill @ 2012-04-12 8:20 ` Fabien Chêne 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Fabien Chêne @ 2012-04-12 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches 2012/4/11 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>: [...] > Your ChangeLog needs to be adjusted. :) I did write an updated ChangeLog, but I pasted here the wrong one... I committed it to trunk yesterday, hopefully with the correct ChangeLog . I'll be backporting it to 4.7 after a relaxing weekend :-) -- Fabien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-12 8:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-03-08 21:35 [C++ Patch] for c++/52465 Fabien Chêne 2012-03-12 12:36 ` Dodji Seketeli 2012-03-12 16:19 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-04-07 15:38 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-03-29 14:11 ` Jason Merrill 2012-04-07 15:37 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-04-07 21:14 ` Jason Merrill 2012-04-10 20:23 ` Fabien Chêne 2012-04-11 2:17 ` Jason Merrill 2012-04-12 8:20 ` Fabien Chêne
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).