public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: "Peryt, Sebastian" <sebastian.peryt@intel.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch][x86, backport] Backport to GCC-7 vzeroupper patches
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4Y1emJi6EKjUhgVqBr=6897K+Jw9=Y+Ehk2h4jRXqNuiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17623B198193D741876BD81A6E3AE5AD3C5A1237@irsmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Peryt, Sebastian
<sebastian.peryt@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask for backporting to GCC-7 branch vzeroupper generation patches from trunk,
> that are resolving 3 PRs:
> PR target/82941
> PR target/82942
> PR target/82990
>
> Two patches were combined into one and rebased. Bootstraped and tested.
> Is it ok for merge?
>
> Changelog:
>
> Fix PR82941 and PR82942 by adding proper vzeroupper generation on SKX.
> Add X86_TUNE_EMIT_VZEROUPPER to indicate if vzeroupper instruction should
> be inserted before a transfer of control flow out of the function.  It is
> turned on by default unless we are tuning for KNL.  Users can always use
> -mzeroupper or -mno-zeroupper to override X86_TUNE_EMIT_VZEROUPPER.
>
> 2017-11-29  Sebastian Peryt  <sebastian.peryt@intel.com>
>         H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
> gcc/
>         Bakcported from trunk
>         PR target/82941
>         PR target/82942
>         PR target/82990
>         * config/i386/i386.c (pass_insert_vzeroupper): Remove
>         TARGET_AVX512F check from gate condition.
>         (ix86_check_avx256_register): Changed to ...
>         (ix86_check_avx_upper_register): ... this. Add extra check for
>         VALID_AVX512F_REG_OR_XI_MODE.
>         (ix86_avx_u128_mode_needed): Changed
>         ix86_check_avx256_register to ix86_check_avx_upper_register.
>         (ix86_check_avx256_stores): Changed to ...
>         (ix86_check_avx_upper_stores): ... this. Changed
>         ix86_check_avx256_register to ix86_check_avx_upper_register.
>         (ix86_avx_u128_mode_after): Changed
>         avx_reg256_found to avx_upper_reg_found. Changed
>         ix86_check_avx256_stores to ix86_check_avx_upper_stores.
>         (ix86_avx_u128_mode_entry): Changed
>         ix86_check_avx256_register to ix86_check_avx_upper_register.
>         (ix86_avx_u128_mode_exit): Ditto.
>         (ix86_option_override_internal): Set MASK_VZEROUPPER if
>         neither -mzeroupper nor -mno-zeroupper is used and
>         TARGET_EMIT_VZEROUPPER is set.
>         * config/i386/i386.h: (host_detect_local_cpu): New define.
>         (TARGET_EMIT_VZEROUPPER): New.
>         * config/i386/x86-tune.def: Add X86_TUNE_EMIT_VZEROUPPER.
>
> 2017-11-29  Sebastian Peryt  <sebastian.peryt@intel.com>
>         H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>         Backported from trunk
>         PR target/82941
>         PR target/82942
>         PR target/82990
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82941-1.c: New test.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82941-2.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82942-1.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82942-2.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-1.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-2.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-3.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-4.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-5.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-6.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr82990-7.c: Likewise.

OK.

Thanks,
Uros.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-29  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-29  9:45 Peryt, Sebastian
2017-11-29  9:55 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFULd4Y1emJi6EKjUhgVqBr=6897K+Jw9=Y+Ehk2h4jRXqNuiw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=sebastian.peryt@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).