From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-365344-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25941 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2014 20:52:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25932 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2014 20:52:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-la0-f45.google.com
Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f45.google.com) (209.85.215.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:52:39 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id hr17so798982lab.18        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.6.2 with SMTP id w2mr11111486law.28.1397767955650; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.136.107 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <534EF799.4070005@redhat.com>
References: <20140113080711.GS892@tucnak.redhat.com>	<534EF799.4070005@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4Y1fnd-UMUYBZdVeGnMwtX3D-tzhrmeTmCDcM06zp4-BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Patch ping
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>, 	Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>, 	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg01049.txt.bz2

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to ping 2 patches:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00140.html
>> - Ensure GET_MODE_{SIZE,INNER,NUNITS} (const) is constant rather than
>>    memory load after optimization (I'd like to keep the current
>> <MODE_SIZE>
>>    patch for the reasons mentioned there, but also add this patch)
>
> This is fine.  Per the follow-up discussion, I think you can mark it was
> resolving 36109 as well.
>
>
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00131.html
>> - PR target/59617
>>    handle gather loads for AVX512 (at least non-masked ones, masked ones
>>    will need to wait for 5.0 and we need to find how to represent it in
>>    GIMPLE)
>
> I'll leave this to Uros :-)

IIRC, this patch was already committed to 4.9 some time ago.

Uros.