From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-331554-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17454 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2012 08:09:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 17441 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2012 08:09:06 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:09:02 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ro12so3930505pbb.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:09:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.194.101 with SMTP id hv5mr14242998pbc.121.1352707742075; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.246.232 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:09:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <EB4625145972F94C9680D8CADD6516153977C118@sausexdag06.amd.com>
References: <EB4625145972F94C9680D8CADD6516153974476B@sausexdag04.amd.com>	<CAFULd4bw7-wGBB8r8Bd8474knJL05Zmk_AiSQN8=uxS3qJrv1Q@mail.gmail.com>	<EB4625145972F94C9680D8CADD65161539766160@sausexdag06.amd.com>	<CAFULd4ax6TAEAdEQQgUxe7m=--tVfMxBe01xUwT64f0W1h+-Sg@mail.gmail.com>	<EB4625145972F94C9680D8CADD651615397673A3@sausexdag06.amd.com>	<CAFULd4bZ65kJAnPPk4fqRD8DOD_wsMaB0zd9PuOZEptRiBaR3w@mail.gmail.com>	<EB4625145972F94C9680D8CADD6516153977C118@sausexdag06.amd.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4YeEXuN-PP=eP1Gp0+CXO2x7mJ8-eFbH4KErJ+zm0-xFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, i386]: AMD bdver3 enablement
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: "Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh" <Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@amd.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00876.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
<Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@amd.com> wrote:
>> You can see from the changes of sse.md that this is functionally a no-op change.
> Sseshuf replaces sselog.
> So, do you mean it should be added with sselog instead of sseadd?
> Adding it with sseadd (instead of sselog) influences the latency information.

sseshuf replaces sselog in some insn patterns, but should be handled
in the same way in *existing* .md files.

Uros,