From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386[stv]: Handle REG_EH_REGION note
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:22:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4Yu7PTEqhNKeBFWq34PAuN_gfi0E_qOEaO1sc5uT-ud4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314013302.994418-1-hongtao.liu@intel.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 2:33 AM liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> When we split
> (insn 37 36 38 10 (set (reg:DI 104 [ _18 ])
> (mem:DI (reg/f:SI 98 [ CallNative_nclosure.0_1 ]) [6 MEM[(struct SQRefCounted *)CallNative_nclosure.0_1]._uiRef+0 S8 A32])) "test.C":22:42 84 {*movdi_internal}
> (expr_list:REG_EH_REGION (const_int -11 [0xfffffffffffffff5])
>
> into
>
> (insn 104 36 37 10 (set (subreg:V2DI (reg:DI 124) 0)
> (vec_concat:V2DI (mem:DI (reg/f:SI 98 [ CallNative_nclosure.0_1 ]) [6 MEM[(struct SQRefCounted *)CallNative_nclosure.0_1]._uiRef+0 S8 A32])
> (const_int 0 [0]))) "test.C":22:42 -1
> (nil)))
> (insn 37 104 105 10 (set (subreg:V2DI (reg:DI 104 [ _18 ]) 0)
> (subreg:V2DI (reg:DI 124) 0)) "test.C":22:42 2024 {movv2di_internal}
> (expr_list:REG_EH_REGION (const_int -11 [0xfffffffffffffff5])
> (nil)))
>
> we must copy the REG_EH_REGION note to the first insn and split the block
> after the newly added insn. The REG_EH_REGION on the second insn will be
> removed later since it no longer traps.
>
> Currently we only handle memory_operand, are there any other insns
> need to be handled???
I think memory access is the only thing that can trap.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,} for trunk and gcc-13/gcc-12 release branch.
> Ok for trunk and backport?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/i386/i386-features.cc
> (general_scalar_chain::convert_op): Handle REG_EH_REGION note.
> (convert_scalars_to_vector): Ditto.
> * config/i386/i386-features.h (class scalar_chain): New
> memeber control_flow_insns.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.target/i386/pr111822.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> gcc/config/i386/i386-features.h | 1 +
> gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr111822.C | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr111822.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
> index 1de2a07ed75..2ed27a9ebdd 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
> @@ -998,20 +998,36 @@ general_scalar_chain::convert_op (rtx *op, rtx_insn *insn)
> }
> else if (MEM_P (*op))
> {
> + rtx_insn* eh_insn, *movabs = NULL;
> rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (*op));
>
> /* Handle movabs. */
> if (!memory_operand (*op, GET_MODE (*op)))
> {
> rtx tmp2 = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (*op));
> + movabs = emit_insn_before (gen_rtx_SET (tmp2, *op), insn);
>
> - emit_insn_before (gen_rtx_SET (tmp2, *op), insn);
> *op = tmp2;
> }
I may be missing something, but isn't the above a dead code? We have
if (MEM_p(*op)) and then if (!memory_operand (*op, ...)).
Uros.
>
> - emit_insn_before (gen_rtx_SET (gen_rtx_SUBREG (vmode, tmp, 0),
> - gen_gpr_to_xmm_move_src (vmode, *op)),
> - insn);
> + eh_insn
> + = emit_insn_before (gen_rtx_SET (gen_rtx_SUBREG (vmode, tmp, 0),
> + gen_gpr_to_xmm_move_src (vmode, *op)),
> + insn);
> +
> + if (cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions)
> + {
> + /* Handle REG_EH_REGION note. */
> + rtx note = find_reg_note (insn, REG_EH_REGION, NULL_RTX);
> + if (note)
> + {
> + if (movabs)
> + eh_insn = movabs;
> + control_flow_insns.safe_push (eh_insn);
> + add_reg_note (eh_insn, REG_EH_REGION, XEXP (note, 0));
> + }
> + }
> +
> *op = gen_rtx_SUBREG (vmode, tmp, 0);
>
> if (dump_file)
> @@ -2494,6 +2510,7 @@ convert_scalars_to_vector (bool timode_p)
> {
> basic_block bb;
> int converted_insns = 0;
> + auto_vec<rtx_insn *> control_flow_insns;
>
> bitmap_obstack_initialize (NULL);
> const machine_mode cand_mode[3] = { SImode, DImode, TImode };
> @@ -2575,6 +2592,11 @@ convert_scalars_to_vector (bool timode_p)
> chain->chain_id);
> }
>
> + rtx_insn* iter_insn;
> + unsigned int ii;
> + FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (chain->control_flow_insns, ii, iter_insn)
> + control_flow_insns.safe_push (iter_insn);
> +
> delete chain;
> }
> }
> @@ -2643,6 +2665,24 @@ convert_scalars_to_vector (bool timode_p)
> DECL_INCOMING_RTL (parm) = gen_rtx_SUBREG (TImode, r, 0);
> }
> }
> +
> + if (!control_flow_insns.is_empty ())
> + {
> + free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
> +
> + unsigned int i;
> + rtx_insn* insn;
> + FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (control_flow_insns, i, insn)
> + if (control_flow_insn_p (insn))
> + {
> + /* Split the block after insn. There will be a fallthru
> + edge, which is OK so we keep it. We have to create
> + the exception edges ourselves. */
> + bb = BLOCK_FOR_INSN (insn);
> + split_block (bb, insn);
> + rtl_make_eh_edge (NULL, bb, BB_END (bb));
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.h
> index 8bab2d8666d..b259cf679af 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ class scalar_chain
> hash_map<rtx, rtx> defs_map;
> unsigned n_sse_to_integer;
> unsigned n_integer_to_sse;
> + auto_vec<rtx_insn *> control_flow_insns;
>
> bool build (bitmap candidates, unsigned insn_uid, bitmap disallowed);
> virtual int compute_convert_gain () = 0;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr111822.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr111822.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..d405387b23c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr111822.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/* PR target/111822 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -flive-range-shrinkage -fno-dce -fnon-call-exceptions" } */
> +
> +typedef union {
> + int *pNativeClosure;
> + struct SQRefCounted *pRefCounted;
> +} SQObjectValue;
> +typedef struct {
> + SQObjectValue _unVal;
> +} SQObject;
> +typedef long SQFUNCTION(struct SQVM *);
> +struct SQVM {
> + void CallNative();
> +};
> +struct SQRefCounted {
> + long long _uiRef;
> +};
> +void Null();
> +struct SQObjectPtr : SQObject {
> + SQObjectPtr() {}
> + SQObjectPtr(int *pNativeClosure) {
> + _unVal.pNativeClosure = pNativeClosure;
> + _unVal.pRefCounted->_uiRef++;
> + }
> + ~SQObjectPtr() { --_unVal.pRefCounted->_uiRef; }
> +};
> +struct CallInfo {
> + SQObjectPtr _closure;
> +};
> +long long _top;
> +SQFUNCTION _function;
> +int *CallNative_nclosure;
> +void SQVM::CallNative() {
> + long long oldtop = _top;
> + CallInfo lci;
> + lci._closure = CallNative_nclosure;
> + try {
> + _function(this);
> + } catch (...) {
> + _top = oldtop;
> + }
> + while (oldtop)
> + Null();
> +}
> --
> 2.31.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-14 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 1:33 liuhongt
2024-03-14 7:22 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2024-03-14 7:43 ` Hongtao Liu
2024-03-14 7:42 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-03-14 14:45 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-03-15 1:24 ` Hongtao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFULd4Yu7PTEqhNKeBFWq34PAuN_gfi0E_qOEaO1sc5uT-ud4w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).