From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-448300-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3207 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2017 10:32:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3192 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2017 10:32:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:763, meaningful
X-HELO: mail-vk0-f66.google.com
Received: from mail-vk0-f66.google.com (HELO mail-vk0-f66.google.com) (209.85.213.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:32:28 +0000
Received: by mail-vk0-f66.google.com with SMTP id t8so2312278vke.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:32:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=nkzUj+FqPYwei3H1Uoe43gccyfRBhGEY0pW9f9YYL7Q=;        b=ZQR7ixmREgZ+me8ef7XepwEfXstJos08Tu/OKkaXCIE1qBHcjRpAqItfudEv4vqYTc         s7t1O59eJaqq7cMcS4+wHgBDg/woXN82YzjNfr9JoPYP86wr5vW4sB2z2dwE7MGKBlF1         FYsps7WnKx6i3f/IHTbDq5DOQ7Z4CiqTps8Yj4zhWs90dPHN/bSqh2KAbpCDHNu+e7vy         9+M+FFYnBp0BYNr53M3UhfdQSZOfn23bBUyK5V7pRezf0PREiestIjFt3gdc2SmUiga/         bQYL9QkbDTNHnKWss1oySAGAauLzSyIzf536eftaaYmYjoFe6WKoPAspdly2A4GPiiQB         LEew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n0LkrQ6KPPjP0t0/bxSdT69nPnTg5E+T2ciEjjf0WkHhACMottcDI1QEdrDp22bG/5JaI2XwSRZh+iZw==
X-Received: by 10.31.164.136 with SMTP id n130mr3927982vke.62.1486722746558; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:32:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.87.11 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:32:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2fd14fe7-8d06-45ab-fb1e-96c9c8f4c03b@pobox.com>
References: <2fd14fe7-8d06-45ab-fb1e-96c9c8f4c03b@pobox.com>
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4Z0_j4XcLFGfJwbFpY+We-uheQmz744ZGLtxL-HafPGHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH v3 0/8] [i386] Use out-of-line stubs for ms_abi pro/epilogues
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, 	Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>, 10walls@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00710.txt.bz2

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:

> Uros or Jan,
> Please take this as a ping, as I never bothered pinging after submitting v2
> since I found a few more issues with it. :) Although I realize this would be
> a GCC 8 stage 1 item, I would like to try to get it finished up and
> tentatively approved as soon as I can.  I have tried to summarize this patch
> set as clearly and succinctly below as possible.  Thanks!

You will need a sign-off from cygwin od mingw-w64 maintainer (CC'd).
While I can review the patch in the sense that it won't break generic
code, I don't know nothing about mingw-64 to give you any meaningful
advice.

Uros.