public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH, i386]: Fix atomic_storedi_fpu predicate
@ 2015-04-01 17:44 Uros Bizjak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Uros Bizjak @ 2015-04-01 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --]

Hello!

Attached patch fixes invalid atomic_storedi_fpu predicate

(match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "x,m,?r").

This predicate is not compatible with memory constraint.

While at this, I also changed expanders to accept memory operands
that can be handled by *_fpu instructions. To avoid unwanted pattern
matching, UNSPEC_MOVA has been replaced with UNSPEC_LDA and
UNSPEC_STA. Also, the move from uninitalized operand in
atomic_store_fpu was fixed in case of memory input operand with xmm
temporary register.

2015-04-01  Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>

    * config/i386/sync.md (UNSPEC_MOVA): Remove.
    (atomic_load<mode>): Change operand 0 predicate to
    nonimmediate_operand and fix up the destination when needed.
    Use UNSPEC_LDA.
    (atomic_loaddi_fpu): Use UNSPEC_LDA.
    (atomic_store<mode>): Change operand 1 predicate to
    nonimmendate_operand and move the source to register when needed.
    Use UNSPEC_STA.
    (atomic_store<mode>_1): Use UNSPEC_STA.
    (atomic_storedi_fpu): Change operand 1 to nonimmediate_operand.
    Fix moves from memory operand.  Use UNSPEC_STA.

The patch was bootstraped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu
{,-m32} and committed to mainline SVN.

Uros.

[-- Attachment #2: p.diff.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3115 bytes --]

Index: config/i386/sync.md
===================================================================
--- config/i386/sync.md	(revision 221807)
+++ config/i386/sync.md	(working copy)
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
   UNSPEC_LFENCE
   UNSPEC_SFENCE
   UNSPEC_MFENCE
-  UNSPEC_MOVA	; For __atomic support
+
+  ;; __atomic support
   UNSPEC_LDA
   UNSPEC_STA
 ])
@@ -140,10 +141,10 @@
    ])
 
 (define_expand "atomic_load<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:ATOMIC 0 "register_operand")
+  [(set (match_operand:ATOMIC 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
 	(unspec:ATOMIC [(match_operand:ATOMIC 1 "memory_operand")
 			(match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand")]
-		       UNSPEC_MOVA))]
+		       UNSPEC_LDA))]
   ""
 {
   /* For DImode on 32-bit, we can use the FPU to perform the load.  */
@@ -152,14 +153,25 @@
 	       (operands[0], operands[1],
 	        assign_386_stack_local (DImode, SLOT_TEMP)));
   else
-    emit_move_insn (operands[0], operands[1]);
+    {
+      rtx dst = operands[0];
+
+      if (MEM_P (dst))
+	dst = gen_reg_rtx (<MODE>mode);
+
+      emit_move_insn (dst, operands[1]);
+
+      /* Fix up the destination if needed.  */
+      if (dst != operands[0])
+	emit_move_insn (operands[0], dst);
+    }
   DONE;
 })
 
 (define_insn_and_split "atomic_loaddi_fpu"
   [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=x,m,?r")
 	(unspec:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "memory_operand" "m,m,m")]
-		   UNSPEC_MOVA))
+		   UNSPEC_LDA))
    (clobber (match_operand:DI 2 "memory_operand" "=X,X,m"))
    (clobber (match_scratch:DF 3 "=X,xf,xf"))]
   "!TARGET_64BIT && (TARGET_80387 || TARGET_SSE)"
@@ -197,9 +209,9 @@
 
 (define_expand "atomic_store<mode>"
   [(set (match_operand:ATOMIC 0 "memory_operand")
-	(unspec:ATOMIC [(match_operand:ATOMIC 1 "register_operand")
+	(unspec:ATOMIC [(match_operand:ATOMIC 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
 			(match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand")]
-		       UNSPEC_MOVA))]
+		       UNSPEC_STA))]
   ""
 {
   enum memmodel model = (enum memmodel) (INTVAL (operands[2]) & MEMMODEL_MASK);
@@ -215,6 +227,8 @@
     }
   else
     {
+      operands[1] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[1]);
+
       /* For seq-cst stores, when we lack MFENCE, use XCHG.  */
       if (model == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST && !(TARGET_64BIT || TARGET_SSE2))
 	{
@@ -238,14 +252,14 @@
   [(set (match_operand:SWI 0 "memory_operand" "=m")
 	(unspec:SWI [(match_operand:SWI 1 "<nonmemory_operand>" "<r><i>")
 		     (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand")]
-		    UNSPEC_MOVA))]
+		    UNSPEC_STA))]
   ""
   "%K2mov{<imodesuffix>}\t{%1, %0|%0, %1}")
 
 (define_insn_and_split "atomic_storedi_fpu"
   [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "memory_operand" "=m,m,m")
-	(unspec:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "x,m,?r")]
-		   UNSPEC_MOVA))
+	(unspec:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "x,m,?r")]
+		   UNSPEC_STA))
    (clobber (match_operand:DI 2 "memory_operand" "=X,X,m"))
    (clobber (match_scratch:DF 3 "=X,xf,xf"))]
   "!TARGET_64BIT && (TARGET_80387 || TARGET_SSE)"
@@ -273,7 +287,7 @@
       else
 	{
 	  adjust_reg_mode (tmp, DImode);
-	  emit_move_insn (tmp, mem);
+	  emit_move_insn (tmp, src);
 	  src = tmp;
 	}
     }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-04-01 17:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-01 17:44 [PATCH, i386]: Fix atomic_storedi_fpu predicate Uros Bizjak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).