public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, 	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>,
		Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>,
	Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] [i386] PR80969 Fix ICE with -mabi=ms -mavx512f
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 13:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZN5oyaQZ9gtY8P5cJ5Xd1d+aE-F9z_okjOB255sArbDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bbd474b-d6f9-eed0-8035-0dd8d4b9379d@pobox.com>

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:
> I had to fix a few things for x32 compatibility and I this is ready
> now.  H.J. tested on machine with avx512 (including x32) and I've tested
> both native x32 and normal x86_64 with m64, m32 and mx32 and all is
> well.  I've made more changes to the tests so I'm just submitting a
> version 2 of the whole patch set.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> 2017-08-22  Daniel Santos  <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
>
>         * config/i386/i386.h (ix86_frame::stack_realign_allocate_offset):
>         Remove field.
>         (ix86_frame::stack_realign_allocate): New field.
>         (struct machine_frame_state): Modify comments.
>         (machine_frame_state::sp_realigned_fp_end): New field.
>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): Rework stack frame
>         layout calculation.
>         (sp_valid_at): Add assertion to assure no attempt to access invalid
>         offset of a realigned stack.
>         (fp_valid_at): Likewise.
>         (choose_baseaddr): Modify comments.
>         (ix86_emit_outlined_ms2sysv_save): Adjust to changes in
>         ix86_expand_prologue.
>         (ix86_expand_prologue): Modify stack realignment and allocation.
>         (ix86_expand_epilogue): Modify comments.
>
> 2017-08-22  Daniel Santos  <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
>
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-1.c: New testcase.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-2a.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-2.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-3.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-4a.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-4b.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-4.c: Likewise.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr80969-4.h: New header common to pr80969-4*.c

I went through the patchset one more time, and I didn't find anything
that would stick out. I have a comment in 4/4, but nothing critical.

IMO extensive testsuite would catch possible bug there, so

OK for mainline.

(But please stay around to fix any possible fallout...)

Thanks,
Uros.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-31 11:16 [PATCH 0/6] " Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] [i386, testsuite] Add tests, fix bug in check_avx2_hw_available Daniel Santos
2017-08-08 19:23   ` [PATCH 6/6 v2] " Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] [i386] Modify SP realignment in ix86_expand_prologue, et. al Daniel Santos
2017-08-02 23:28   ` [PATCH 5/6 v2] " Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] [i386] Remove ix86_frame::outlined_save_offset Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 13:53   ` Uros Bizjak
2017-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] [i386] Remove machine_function::call_ms2sysv_pad_out Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 13:59   ` Uros Bizjak
2017-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] [i386] Correct comments, add assertions to sp_valid_at and fp_valid_at Daniel Santos
2017-07-31 17:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] [i386] PR80969 Fix ICE with -mabi=ms -mavx512f Daniel Santos
2017-08-01  6:20   ` Uros Bizjak
2017-08-08 19:31 ` PING " Daniel Santos
2017-08-22 22:44   ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Daniel Santos
2017-08-22 23:23     ` [PATCH 1/4] [i386] Correct comments, add assertions to sp_valid_at and fp_valid_at Daniel Santos
2017-08-23  3:51     ` [PATCH 4/4] [i386, testsuite] Add tests, fix bug in check_avx2_hw_available Daniel Santos
2017-08-23 13:46       ` Uros Bizjak
2017-08-24  1:32         ` Daniel Santos
2017-08-23  4:17     ` [PATCH 2/4] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout Daniel Santos
2017-08-23  4:18     ` [PATCH 3/4] [i386] Modify SP realignment in ix86_expand_prologue, et. al Daniel Santos
2017-08-23 13:53     ` Uros Bizjak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFULd4ZN5oyaQZ9gtY8P5cJ5Xd1d+aE-F9z_okjOB255sArbDg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).