public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH, i386]: Fix secondary_reload_needed (was: Re: [PATCH, i386]: Improve STV conversion of shifts)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZPmuiugYnExoWejibnCPLfaQJQpfrab3gCUkyfDi8cBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4Yaoa3h4vtd=x0yposto8hsLouLAwSdF5P2thG9CuVC=A@mail.gmail.com>

As usual with costing changes, the patch exposes latent problem. The
patched compiler tries to generate non-existing DImode move from mask
register to XMM register, and ICEs during reload [1]. Attached patch
tightens secondary_reload_needed condition and fixes the issue.

I'm bootstrapping and regression testing patch, and will submit a
formal submission later today.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2019-08/msg00537.html

Uros.

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:53 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:12 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Attached patch improves costing for STV shifts and corrects reject
> > condition for out of range shift count operands.
> >
> > 2019-08-28  Uroš Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> >
> >     * config/i386/i386-features.c
> >     (general_scalar_chain::compute_convert_gain):
> >     Correct cost for double-word shifts.
> >     (general_scalar_to_vector_candidate_p): Reject count operands
> >     greater or equal to mode bitsize.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
> >
> > Committed to mainline SVN.
>
> Ouch... I mixed up patches and actually committed the patch that
> removes maximum from cost of sse<->int moves.
>
> I can leave the patch for a day, so we can see the effects of the cost
> change, and if the patch creates problems, I'll revert it.
>
> Sorry for the mixup,
> Uros.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-28 16:12 [PATCH, i386]: Improve STV conversion of shifts Uros Bizjak
2019-08-29  8:49 ` Uros Bizjak
2019-08-29 10:11   ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2019-08-29 10:17     ` [PATCH, i386]: Fix secondary_reload_needed (was: Re: [PATCH, i386]: Improve STV conversion of shifts) Uros Bizjak
2019-08-30  7:40   ` [PATCH, i386]: Improve STV conversion of shifts Richard Biener
2019-08-30  8:29     ` [PATCH, i386]: Do not limit the cost of moves to/from XMM register to minimum 8 Uros Bizjak
2019-08-31  3:01       ` Alan Modra
2019-08-31 16:12         ` Richard Biener
2019-09-01 19:49           ` Uros Bizjak
2019-09-02  7:16             ` Alan Modra
2019-09-02  8:13             ` Hongtao Liu
2019-09-02  8:41               ` Uros Bizjak
2019-09-03  7:57                 ` Hongtao Liu
2019-09-03 11:24                   ` Richard Biener
2019-09-03 11:33                     ` Richard Biener
2019-09-03 16:50                       ` Uros Bizjak
2019-09-04  1:42                         ` Hongtao Liu
2019-09-05  5:47                           ` Hongtao Liu
2019-09-05  8:54                             ` Uros Bizjak
2019-09-06 19:32                               ` [PATCH, i386]: Fix PR 91654: Runtime SPEC regression on Haswell Uros Bizjak
2019-09-02 10:23               ` [PATCH, i386]: Do not limit the cost of moves to/from XMM register to minimum 8 Richard Biener
2019-09-03  1:37                 ` Hongtao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFULd4ZPmuiugYnExoWejibnCPLfaQJQpfrab3gCUkyfDi8cBA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).