And the patch...

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:00 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As usual with costing changes, the patch exposes latent problem. The
> patched compiler tries to generate non-existing DImode move from mask
> register to XMM register, and ICEs during reload [1]. Attached patch
> tightens secondary_reload_needed condition and fixes the issue.
>
> I'm bootstrapping and regression testing patch, and will submit a
> formal submission later today.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2019-08/msg00537.html
>
> Uros.
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:53 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:12 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached patch improves costing for STV shifts and corrects reject
> > > condition for out of range shift count operands.
> > >
> > > 2019-08-28  Uroš Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >     * config/i386/i386-features.c
> > >     (general_scalar_chain::compute_convert_gain):
> > >     Correct cost for double-word shifts.
> > >     (general_scalar_to_vector_candidate_p): Reject count operands
> > >     greater or equal to mode bitsize.
> > >
> > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.
> > >
> > > Committed to mainline SVN.
> >
> > Ouch... I mixed up patches and actually committed the patch that
> > removes maximum from cost of sse<->int moves.
> >
> > I can leave the patch for a day, so we can see the effects of the cost
> > change, and if the patch creates problems, I'll revert it.
> >
> > Sorry for the mixup,
> > Uros.