From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-494387-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 50885 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2019 18:12:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50872 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jan 2019 18:12:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy=click, website
X-HELO: mail-io1-f67.google.com
Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com (HELO mail-io1-f67.google.com) (209.85.166.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 18:12:15 +0000
Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s8so2427063iob.13        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 10:12:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=UZ6K7N3Xb43oYv1LXmezQECuPN28iXRQOuamSrR4l60=;        b=hcckJh/rSKcLCZISTUx10LGpAC57e1iSYYx3t/O1V5AjmQ/9933A9PXR9/+Cpkvorj         uL25NV1a4Vg2PelJFVL5YvC6GnXVVlQcxsQ7JT1RQLylr/YLkt+bdh+0x3xzn62YrXXG         s04DplDR7ySdBT5qiRXekytYKla4NhQ2xzAjZdXdyu87mLL84AZw3tI6YeZcsmVcGSyR         r0uosN4ORhzR6TkKutWkYKauSAYDW6/S0lJzMI+ei2GR7fcszOtak5ksghLcaQxLdgy4         CdUIV7UsxzCsh0oyiU5Pbc6V2uAE37K/+TPCKbzKSOE9Hu16dwIQUNkUWH3K4V5JGw4c         sXfQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190119160233.GA27159@gmail.com> <CAFULd4ZX9wZnY_g+xUuPtY3bG7AsksGt5zuCd+b+BaepALtqtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoeLi4yneMounb4zp1xjNMMMMtweP4VSKe7vn7pjKKf=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4bkJmNMa5jnGRKmfozGzAF73P+tHKqm-8dwz=ynzgdePg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4bkJmNMa5jnGRKmfozGzAF73P+tHKqm-8dwz=ynzgdePg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 18:12:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZoqFy2t9O7Pc4M9_wdu_a-oeiyZX5K5ORVQu2B-e5FGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Move Intel intrinsics head files to <immintrin.h>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg01156.txt.bz2

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 7:09 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:11 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:03 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/19/19, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > According to Intel Intrinsics Guide:
> > > >
> > > > https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/
> > > >
> > > > Intel intrinsics should be available by including <immintrin.h>.  This
> > > > patch moves remaining Intel intrinsics head files from <x86intrin.h> to
> > > > <immintrin.h>.
> > >
> > > I can't find the quoted requirement in the provided link.
> >
> > That is an interactive website.  If you type in "_xgetbv" and click on it,
> > you will get
> >
> > Synopsis
> >
> > unsigned __int64 _xgetbv (unsigned int a)
> > #include <immintrin.h>
> > Instruction: xgetbv
> > CPUID Flags: XSAVE
> >
> > Description
> >
> > Copy up to 64-bits from the value of the extended control register
> > (XCR) specified by a into dst. Currently only XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK
> > XCR is supported.
> >
> > Operation
> >
> > dst[63:0] := XCR[a]
>
> Ah, thanks for the hint. LGTM, but still needs RM approval.

I wonder, what is/was the purpose of x86intrin.h, considering that
everything can be included from immintrin.h?

Uros.