From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-511821-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 44560 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2019 17:57:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 44543 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2019 17:57:04 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:746, H*f:sk:KFq46TJ, H*i:sk:KFq46TJ
X-HELO: mail-il1-f196.google.com
Received: from mail-il1-f196.google.com (HELO mail-il1-f196.google.com) (209.85.166.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 17:57:03 +0000
Received: by mail-il1-f196.google.com with SMTP id d83so4572610ilk.7        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=0HO+YWtFkoK0smKtCqSYwerbecQcmXiXgws7sHZYrJM=;        b=EcvbToQngmSuAV8ErAU2NFYAK0DdNTzSNe858PF1SLFUipr78NVWH5EUok4NngweWm         vXsaM5pCh63bspHau4Viofx2CD4+OrVDC+Xk4kmdLIhJXUJ+rZbngEyg+0hS0PzCSO/5         jJcLyABzHzHFSDjWOlJWlU8gwQ/EBe1lhzVRV2DduJjn8vDSWHU3HhJPAWSlqvze4lT6         iXE54LAGp+guK2iGwCRZbauWAYqE6zMOczIkzovzP/Wes3qzznNQaH2cUbD/TpQygQWP         YrhiKxcTMQwe2fU6eQ39hJF3IHXH1nQkOoNvIw3Y1ah2gRm5UaW/cd1SJlQNceFc9eXa         xmUA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMZc-bxQ5hK9X5rztb_H+KFq46TJGogS0PmsxUMfAtaGt-P4BQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMZc-bxQ5hK9X5rztb_H+KFq46TJGogS0PmsxUMfAtaGt-P4BQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4a+zV08JYUV2qvwuzLy_vbcJaCRzrx02HUk0bLy7+yinQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove redudant iptr when operand already has a scalar mode.
To: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg01892.txt.bz2

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 3:27 PM Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > BTW: Please also note that there is no need to use <iptr> or operand
> > mode override in scalar insn templates for intel asm dialect when
> > operand already has a scalar mode.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01868.html
>
> This patch is to remove redundant <iptr> when operand already has a scalar mode.
>
> bootstrap and regression test for i386/x86-64 is ok.
>
> Changelog
> gcc/
>         * config/i386/sse.md (*<sse>_vm<plusminus_insn><mode>3,
>         <sse>_vm<multdiv_mnemonic><mode>3): Remove <iptr> since
>         operand is already scalar mode.
>         (iptr): Remove SF/DF.

OK.

Thanks,
Uros.