From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-339915-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10401 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 10:05:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10354 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2013 10:05:13 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:05:13 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wn14so4009151obc.32        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.7.97 with SMTP id i1mr7446995oea.89.1366020311510; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.49.68 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABySjRs+9oLLxiC+fmoJVRxciz_1=PQMddyE9LiFuE1Z0P-yrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFULd4abCfCaQh8umyhR5+fU6sDnCZH+berXQ1xAntmN8KHpHg@mail.gmail.com>	<CABySjRuYS4aBPHNiHrQMfQgZM=sK7FVcaCCohHULK8O_urRXCQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4bfzj=PgEZXG354cskm58J+-pj60dPn4WS8AiRGGWN7Lg@mail.gmail.com>	<CABySjRsJ0q+eaH4xXGzAuyjboZALyC-4wytKyPaD1TgGfcv1pQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CABySjRvVyiMwRqcMEEQiJYzX=qk8yXR1ogJcVaihFH6Oz_7qLQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4aPVLUvK3zx7=bA7pPzhJdx_QBTGzRzN_0rtKwpZB29pA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABySjRs+9oLLxiC+fmoJVRxciz_1=PQMddyE9LiFuE1Z0P-yrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:51:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4a6TY=xBUyxbBGHtcDmrBvP-ymv_5sEyOq5i-tikDPsMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH,i386] Add -mstack-protector-guard= for i386
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Hsieh <andrewhsieh@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00916.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Andrew Hsieh <andrewhsieh@google.com> wrote:
> Sure.  Put back Init(SSP_TLS) and rebase to r197955.
> If no further feedback, please merge.

Committed with slightly changed ChangeLog entry:

2013-04-15  Andrew Hsieh  <andrewhsieh.google.com>

    * config/i386/i386.opt: New option mstack-protector-guard=.
    * config/i386/i386-opts.h: Add enum stack_protector_guard.
    * config/i386/i386.h: Define TARGET_SSP_GLOBAL_GUARD and
    TARGET_SSP_TLS_GUARD.
    * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Set
    ix86_stack_protector_guard.
    * config/i386/i386.md (stack_protect_set): Enable for
    TARGET_SSP_TLS_GUARD only.
    (stack_protect_set_<mode>): Ditto.
    (stack_protect_test): Ditto.
    (stack_protect_test_<mode>): Ditto.
    * doc/invoke.texi (i386 Option): Document.

Thanks,
Uros.