public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
		Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i386] Move CLOBBERED_REGS earlier in register class list
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4aL84sSpFEsxZ2f14QODjHueVbx4K70K2myoV2i8pjzLw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.11.1505111920080.22867@monopod.intra.ispras.ru>

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
>> >>> LEGACY_REGS, which causes IRA not to consider it separately for register
>> >>> allocation, even when it has lower cost than other classes.  This patch is
>> >>> useful to fix code generation problem that appears with no-PLT PIC tailcalls.
>> >>>
>> >>> Was there a specific reason for CLOBBERED_REGS class to be listed as late as
>> >>> it is?  On 32-bit this class contains only EAX, ECX, EDX.
>> >>
>> >> Uros moved CLOBBERED_REGS late in
>> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg00796.html
>> >> which contains a rationale, too.
>> >>
>> >> I am adding Uros and Vladimir to CC just in case they missed the email :)
>> >> Honza
>> >
>> > Uh, I don't remember that far, but from the context of the referred
>> > patch, it looks like a "cleanup" of some sort. My atch matched 32bit
>> > to 64bit, but could be also in the opposite way. Let's try the patch
>> > and see what breaks.
>>
>> Ah, the reason was that 64bit targets have many more call-clobbered
>> registers. So, I tried to position CLOBBERED_REGS according to the
>> ascending number of registers in the register set. Maybe the most
>> clean solution is to split the class to CLOBBERED_REGS_32 and
>> CLOBBERED_REGS_64 classes and set the register constraint in
>> constraints.md depending on TARGET_64BIT.
>
> Is there something to be gained by doing such a split?
>
> It seems to me that trying clobbered regs for allocation earlier that others
> (thus, callee-saved) makes sense in general, at least for non-static functions,
> as callers in other TUs would have to save/restore those registers anyway.

OK, if the position of CLOBBERED_REGS doesn't affect other
functionality (for 32, 64 and MS_ABI targets), then just move the
definition to the better place. Please also add the comment explaining
the rationale to prevent possible "cleanup" attempts in the future.

Thanks,
Uros.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 16:38 PIC calls without PLT, generic implementation Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] PR65753: allow PIC tail calls via function pointers Alexander Monakov
2015-05-10 16:37   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 16:11     ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [RFC PATCH] ira: accept loads via argp rtx in validate_equiv_mem Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 17:37   ` Jeff Law
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] Extend sibcall peepholes to allow source in %eax Alexander Monakov
2015-05-10 16:54   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 17:50     ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-11 18:00       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 19:46         ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-11 19:48           ` Jeff Law
2015-05-11 20:16             ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-13 19:05               ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-13 20:04                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-14 17:36                   ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] Move CLOBBERED_REGS earlier in register class list Alexander Monakov
2015-05-10 16:44   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-10 17:51     ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-10 18:09       ` Uros Bizjak
2015-05-11 16:26         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-11 16:30           ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH i386] Allow sibcalls in no-PLT PIC Alexander Monakov
2015-05-15 16:37   ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-15 16:48     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 20:08       ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-15 20:23         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 20:35           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-15 20:37             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 20:45               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-15 22:16                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:14                   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-15 23:30                     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:35                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:44                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-16  0:18                           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-16 14:33                             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-16 19:03                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-16 19:32                                 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-16 23:23                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-15 23:49                       ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 14:48                         ` Michael Matz
2015-05-19 15:11                           ` Jeff Law
2015-05-19 16:03                             ` Michael Matz
2015-05-19 19:11                               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 18:08                           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 19:03                             ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 19:10                               ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-19 19:17                                 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 19:20                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-19 19:54                                     ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 20:27                                     ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 20:44                                       ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-19 21:28                                         ` Rich Felker
2015-05-20  0:52                                           ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-20  1:09                                             ` Rich Felker
2015-05-22 19:32                                               ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-19 19:48                               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-19 20:16                                 ` Richard Henderson
2015-05-20 12:13                               ` Michael Matz
2015-05-20 12:40                                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-20 14:17                                 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-20 14:33                                   ` Michael Matz
2015-05-18 18:25         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-18 19:03           ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-04 16:38 ` [PATCH] Expand PIC calls without PLT with -fno-plt Alexander Monakov
2015-05-04 17:34   ` Jeff Law
2015-05-04 17:40     ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-04 17:42       ` Jeff Law
2015-05-06  3:08         ` Rich Felker
2015-05-10 17:07           ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-06 15:25         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-06 15:46           ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-06 15:55             ` Jeff Law
2015-05-06 16:44             ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-06 17:35               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 18:26                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-06 18:37                   ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 18:45                     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-06 19:01                       ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 19:05                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-06 19:18                           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-06 19:24                             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-11 11:48                             ` Michael Matz
2015-05-11 14:20                               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-07 18:22           ` Jeff Law
2015-05-07 19:13             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-10 16:59   ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-11 20:36     ` Jeff Law
2015-05-11 20:55       ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-11 22:13         ` Jan Hubicka
2015-06-22 15:52   ` Jiong Wang
2015-06-22 18:18     ` Alexander Monakov
2015-06-23  8:41       ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-23 10:43         ` Alexander Monakov
2015-06-23 13:28         ` Jeff Law
2015-07-16 10:37           ` [AArch64] Tighten direct call pattern to repair -fno-plt Jiong Wang
2015-07-16 10:47             ` Alexander Monakov
2015-07-16 10:48               ` Jiong Wang
2015-07-21 12:52                 ` [AArch64][sibcall]Tighten " Jiong Wang
2015-08-04  9:50                   ` James Greenhalgh
2015-08-06 16:18                     ` [COMMITTED][AArch64][sibcall]Tighten " Jiong Wang
2015-08-07  8:22                       ` James Greenhalgh
2015-08-07 13:28                         ` Jiong Wang
2015-08-04  9:50             ` [AArch64] Tighten " James Greenhalgh
2015-08-06 16:16               ` [COMMITTED][AArch64] " Jiong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFULd4aL84sSpFEsxZ2f14QODjHueVbx4K70K2myoV2i8pjzLw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=vmakarov@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).