public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, uros@gcc.gnu.org, 	rth@redhat.com,
	artyom.shinkaroff@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change vcond<mode> to vcond<mode1><mode2>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4aUjdoiqeZ5Rg=ch8utm81_W0z+_H226v-Ff4zi6b7w1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110830090713.GG2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> > Hmm.  But then I'd have to try emit an insn, right?  Currently
>> > the vectorizer simply looks for an optab handler ... the
>> > operands are not readily available (but their mode is known).
>> > So I'd create some fake regs, setup operands and call GEN_FCN
>> > on it?  If it succeds I'd have to delete emitted insns, etc.
>> > Or I could add a target hook ...
>>
>> Hm... indeed, too much complication...
>>
>> I'd say, let's go with modeless operands and a target hook. IMO, this
>> is much more flexible than checking optab for supported modes.
>> Existing way is appropriate for single mode patterns, but we have
>> interdependent modes here, at least on x86.
>>
>> The hook would have two input arguments, insn mode and compare mode,
>> where the hook returns suggested supported compare mode, or no mode,
>> if it really can't handle requested modes.
>
> I think a two mode vcond pattern is in fact much cleaner than
> a one mode + modeless pattern which gen* will complain about and
> a target hook.

OK, but in this case, do not use mode iterators too much in order to
avoid invalid patterns.

Uros.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-30  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-29 15:08 Richard Guenther
2011-08-29 16:36 ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-29 20:47 ` Uros Bizjak
2011-08-29 21:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-30  9:00     ` Uros Bizjak
2011-08-30  9:19       ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-30  9:24         ` Uros Bizjak
2011-08-30  9:29           ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-08-30  9:39             ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-30  9:42             ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2011-08-30 10:17               ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-30 10:48                 ` Uros Bizjak
2011-08-30 11:59                   ` Richard Guenther
2011-08-30 12:11                     ` Richard Guenther
2011-09-02  9:44                       ` Richard Guenther
2011-09-02 12:19                         ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFULd4aUjdoiqeZ5Rg=ch8utm81_W0z+_H226v-Ff4zi6b7w1w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=artyom.shinkaroff@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=uros@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).