public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't error about x86 return value in SSE reg (or x86 reg) or argument in SSE reg too early (PR target/80298)
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4aYc__5SPGZhioYF4zLbUiMwVN_ms7OYi_K34JmJkyaBQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405082014.GO17461@tucnak>

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:12:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Oh, I forgot to point out that on x86_64 ABI specifies MMX values in
>> SSE registers.
>
> I know it does.  And if people have their own function that returns
> __m64 or takes such arguments, they surely have to.
> The question is only about the case when no function (in the assembly)
> returns in SSE registers nor gets arguments in them, when all the
> MMX code is inside of a function.
> With your patch, it is - the MMX intrinsics are functions and we error on
> them even when they are inlined.
> With my patch we count only the non-inlined functions, something we emit
> assembly for or call them from other TUs.
>
> If you think requiring SSE for MMX always in 64-bit code is fine, even
> when not strictly needed (as in, you really don't need SSE ISA to execute
> such code, although there are no CPUs without that HW), so be it, then
> let's go with your patch.

Yes, I think that we should consistently warn even in case intrinsic
is inlined. I'm afraid that otherwise we will have endless stream of
bugreports that something warns with -O0, but not -O1+, when LTO is
used, etc, etc... The rule is: When user uses (or intends to use) MMX
value (that goes in SSE reg on x86_64), -msse is needed on x86_64,
otherwise warning is emitted.

Uros.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-04 19:24 Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05  7:42 ` Uros Bizjak
2017-04-05  8:00   ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05  8:12     ` Uros Bizjak
2017-04-05  8:20       ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05  8:26         ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2017-04-05  8:29           ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-04-05 15:37             ` Uros Bizjak
2017-04-06 18:37               ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFULd4aYc__5SPGZhioYF4zLbUiMwVN_ms7OYi_K34JmJkyaBQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).