From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-406595-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 110203 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2015 08:05:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 110191 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2015 08:05:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vk0-f54.google.com
Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-vk0-f54.google.com) (209.85.213.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 08:05:35 +0000
Received: by vkhf67 with SMTP id f67so20100290vkh.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 01:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.252.7 with SMTP id zo7mr43460833vdc.79.1441267533202; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 01:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.26.7 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 01:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <SN2PR0701MB102453B17A317D2880604A428E680@SN2PR0701MB1024.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SN2PR0701MB10245B423874D1D4C9B93F9F8E6A0@SN2PR0701MB1024.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.20.1509021314500.3926@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>	<SN2PR0701MB102453B17A317D2880604A428E680@SN2PR0701MB1024.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 08:39:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4aqYXBAgYkObphfYkXb=bvZO3R8SK7twBSjg7XtNmPXoA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] PR67351 Implement << N & >> N optimizers
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: "Hurugalawadi, Naveen" <Naveen.Hurugalawadi@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	"marc.glisse@inria.fr" <marc.glisse@inria.fr>, "Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen
<Naveen.Hurugalawadi@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for all the review and comments.
>
>>> replace the precision test with wi::ltu_p (@1, TYPE_PRECISION (type)
>>> use element_precision instead of TYPE_PRECISION
>
> Please find attached the modified patch as per review comments.
>
> Please review the same and let me know if the patch is okay?
>
> Regression Tested on AArch64 and X86_64.

+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "<<" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not ">>" } } */

You probably want to use scan-tree-dump-not here.

Uros.