From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396549-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 34776 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2015 19:34:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34758 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2015 19:34:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f52.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f52.google.com) (209.85.218.52) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:34:29 +0000
Received: by oign205 with SMTP id n205so56011569oig.2        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.75.230 with SMTP id f6mr4790936obw.65.1430422467747; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.147.170 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABtf2+Q88YOgp2rMxBJKUMWdH30BO323LeQAty-bFPa+P5SB5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFULd4anFuykMh6ZmDhJ7QM_5enEpR=1p=S5n5gRgcHHpR1zmA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABtf2+Q-fqDMUwCBY5WdoRYnyOh+MOB9G8HQh9+e3U_wHRjpoQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4b9B5LD1khwkefwnLfarjJMMTayS=_uxaheiXPhjGj3CQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4Y4KnrkzuSKxsdkmHuMmZ-qzQvjR80BB44AP-SEiq=RLQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CABtf2+Rnjp7f+wHUpn_E2dti-CkYTMk28puyH-EL1=5ep-brKA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABtf2+TqLWgJr5od3pETcV3W7ZQ7-sm9zQXjVc6z0MBhGwGuZQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFULd4YbMsxuOQko2jy7LdxiL0Ob=fR5v4qCXOEM80iPHE=1cA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABtf2+TGMehxiZDSXXCbX76AWYk5oXy-UdEUwEqWPXr2uYg51w@mail.gmail.com>	<554268AB.9060009@redhat.com>	<CAMe9rOpkE88bENod42T43KpToY0odiVWk8p=0bWYcu7ADyQM4Q@mail.gmail.com>	<CABtf2+Q88YOgp2rMxBJKUMWdH30BO323LeQAty-bFPa+P5SB5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:38:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4b1UvAQ6knTLxKVXY78MJp4SczJg+YcaMrFv-E4F8ny=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix size & type for cold partition names (hot-cold function partitioning)
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, 	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02089.txt.bz2

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com> wrote:
> What is the correct way to regenerate doc/tm.texi?

I have just committed the fix.

Uros.