From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-336096-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1890 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2013 20:03:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 1875 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2013 20:03:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-oa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.219.48)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:03:35 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h2so3155018oag.7        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:03:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.12.103 with SMTP id x7mr12615589oeb.56.1359403415066; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.49.68 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:03:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <329FEE5DE1D3490D85226F0FF93154F2@AMDP6>
References: <CAFULd4ad2fAQ3YhLVEWmuA8kBnrh6StkHPKWZndv10h3Ecm4GQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4A4D1EB90016420C88D9C8DF7B633E73@AMDP6>	<15368AFB015C4FB9B1FB9B080B43DBE8@AMDP6>	<CAFULd4YgKVK0AHOwdoffs_icDfATiOnFZ541D5jaBJ0ka7ABOQ@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1301090936130.6889@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>	<E5B069B6BCFF497584F8635FA9BBF98A@AMDP6>	<CAFULd4bm8gwLoKkBEEPp8HPepE7X_ikpCeWTq9BrW4XDiRNoJw@mail.gmail.com>	<329FEE5DE1D3490D85226F0FF93154F2@AMDP6>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:03:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4b5V-Y9me9yV7bOddjLJAkT=9JZmFO---irZ+7XAUHgUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding target rdos to GCC
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Leif Ekblad <leif@rdos.net>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, 	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01339.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Leif Ekblad <leif@rdos.net> wrote:

> That is intentional. The gthr-rdos.h file is part of libgcc. My intention
> was to first patch gcc, then update the patches for newlib, and finally
> libgcc. The gthr-rdos.h file would reference include-files part of newlib,
> so this is kind of circular. I also cannot define the thread model for RDOS
> unless I define this file.
>
> I see a couple of possible solutions:
> 1. Keep as is. You cannot build libgcc at the current stage anyway, and the
> bootstrap must be built without threading
> 2. Add an empty gthr-rdos.h file until libgcc is done
> 3. Remove the threading-model for now, and add it with libgcc instead.

I propose option 3.

Is it enough to remove gthr.m4 change from the patch in this case?

Uros.