public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, 	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix size & type for cold partition names (hot-cold function partitioning)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4b9B5LD1khwkefwnLfarjJMMTayS=_uxaheiXPhjGj3CQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABtf2+Q-fqDMUwCBY5WdoRYnyOh+MOB9G8HQh9+e3U_wHRjpoQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com> wrote:
> The attached patch can revert the previous patch, if that is the way
> we should proceed on this.  If you want me to apply the reversion,
> please let me know.
>
> I would be happy to fix to the problem, rather than just reverting the
> patch, but I do not have expertise in assembly language on other
> platforms, so I would need some help, if anyone would be interested in
> helping me?

How about adding ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_NAME and
ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_SIZE? If these are defined, they can be used
instead, and targets are free to define them in any way.

Uros.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-29 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-29 16:48 Uros Bizjak
2015-04-29 17:57 ` Caroline Tice
2015-04-29 18:12   ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2015-04-29 18:52     ` Uros Bizjak
2015-04-29 19:08       ` Caroline Tice
2015-04-29 21:30         ` Caroline Tice
2015-04-30  4:15           ` Jack Howarth
2015-04-30  6:40           ` Uros Bizjak
2015-04-30 16:36             ` Caroline Tice
2015-04-30 17:32               ` Uros Bizjak
2015-04-30 17:44               ` Richard Henderson
2015-04-30 19:34                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-04-30 19:34                   ` Caroline Tice
2015-04-30 19:38                     ` Uros Bizjak
2015-04-30 19:42                     ` H.J. Lu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-28 17:14 David Edelsohn
2015-04-28 17:15 ` Caroline Tice
2015-04-28 17:16   ` Jeff Law
2015-04-28 17:17   ` Gerald Pfeifer
2015-04-28 17:33   ` David Edelsohn
2015-04-28 17:36     ` Caroline Tice
2014-12-05 22:41 Caroline Tice
2014-12-08 21:07 ` Jeff Law
2015-03-27 16:45   ` Caroline Tice
2015-03-31  5:19     ` Jeff Law
2015-03-31 15:13       ` Caroline Tice
2015-03-31 15:17         ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFULd4b9B5LD1khwkefwnLfarjJMMTayS=_uxaheiXPhjGj3CQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=cmtice@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).