From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396371-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 93196 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2015 17:47:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93183 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2015 17:47:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f44.google.com
Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-oi0-f44.google.com) (209.85.218.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:47:48 +0000
Received: by oica37 with SMTP id a37so28068654oic.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.85.197 with SMTP id j188mr196358oib.80.1430329666892; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.147.170 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABtf2+Q-fqDMUwCBY5WdoRYnyOh+MOB9G8HQh9+e3U_wHRjpoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFULd4anFuykMh6ZmDhJ7QM_5enEpR=1p=S5n5gRgcHHpR1zmA@mail.gmail.com>	<CABtf2+Q-fqDMUwCBY5WdoRYnyOh+MOB9G8HQh9+e3U_wHRjpoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:12:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4b9B5LD1khwkefwnLfarjJMMTayS=_uxaheiXPhjGj3CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix size & type for cold partition names (hot-cold function partitioning)
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, 	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01911.txt.bz2

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com> wrote:
> The attached patch can revert the previous patch, if that is the way
> we should proceed on this.  If you want me to apply the reversion,
> please let me know.
>
> I would be happy to fix to the problem, rather than just reverting the
> patch, but I do not have expertise in assembly language on other
> platforms, so I would need some help, if anyone would be interested in
> helping me?

How about adding ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_NAME and
ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_SIZE? If these are defined, they can be used
instead, and targets are free to define them in any way.

Uros.