public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues
Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 18:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4bFuNx6hJAEcn1zz30yCaDV6Xn_Z2ssJ2TsA3Su4hcJ0A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08ca9667-0844-13a9-890b-a2c7092e060a@pobox.com>

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com> wrote:
> Ping?  I have posted revisions of the following in patch set:
>
> 05/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01442.html
> 09/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00348.html
> 11/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00350.html
>
> I have retested them on Linux x86-64 in addition a Wine testsuite comparison
> resulting in fewer failed tests (31) than when using unpatched 7.1.0 (78)
> and 5.4.0 (78).  A cursory examination of the now working failures with
> 7.1.0 seemed to be to be due to race conditions in Wine that are
> incidentally hidden after the patches.
>
> Is there anything else needed before we can commit these?  They still rebase
> cleanly onto the HEAD, but I can repost as "v5" if you prefer.

Please go ahead and commit the patches.

However, please stay around to fix possible fallout. As said - you are
touching quite complex part of the compiler ...

Thanks,
Uros.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-13 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-27  8:05 Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] [i386,testsuite] Test program for ms to sysv abi function calls Daniel Santos
2017-05-17  9:52   ` Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] [i386] Use re-aligned stack pointer for aligned SSE movs Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] [i386] Add option -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-28  6:00   ` Sandra Loosemore
2017-04-28  7:37     ` [PATCH 05/12 rev 1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] [i386] Add remainder of -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues implementation Daniel Santos
2017-05-04 22:11   ` [PATCH 11/12 rev1] " Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] [i386] Add patterns and predicates foutline-msabi-xlouges Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:18   ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 22:19     ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03  6:17       ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-03  7:38         ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03  8:38           ` Uros Bizjak
2017-05-04 21:35   ` [PATCH 09/12 rev1] [i386] Add patterns and predicates mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] [i386] Keep stack pointer valid after after re-alignment Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] [i386] Add ms2sysv pro/epilogue stubs to libgcc Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] [i386] Re-align stack frame prior to SSE saves Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] [i386] Modify ix86_compute_frame_layout for -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:23 ` [PATCH 04/12] [i386] Minor refactoring Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] [i386] Modify ix86_save_reg to optionally omit stub-managed registers Daniel Santos
2017-04-27  8:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] [i386] Add class xlogue_layout and new fields to struct machine_function Daniel Santos
2017-04-27 18:32 ` [PATCH v4 0/12 GCC8] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues Daniel Santos
2017-05-01 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/12] " Uros Bizjak
2017-05-02 10:25   ` JonY
2017-05-02 10:45     ` Kai Tietz
2017-05-03  6:01       ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-05  9:05       ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-06 20:41         ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-08 20:07           ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-03  4:32     ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-13  0:01 ` [PING] " Daniel Santos
2017-05-13 18:29   ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2017-05-13 23:43     ` Daniel Santos
2017-05-14 10:25       ` Uros Bizjak
2017-07-26 19:03         ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-27  0:36           ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 13:51           ` Daniel Santos
2017-07-28 14:41             ` H.J. Lu
2017-07-31 10:25               ` Daniel Santos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFULd4bFuNx6hJAEcn1zz30yCaDV6Xn_Z2ssJ2TsA3Su4hcJ0A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).