From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2786 invoked by alias); 13 May 2017 16:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2773 invoked by uid 89); 13 May 2017 16:52:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1095 X-HELO: mail-ua0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-ua0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-ua0-f176.google.com) (209.85.217.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 May 2017 16:52:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ua0-f176.google.com with SMTP id e55so60952674uaa.2 for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7dindu2vSlpMD8eH4xfAY0tlbacot4vX2cPeXbtb2DQ=; b=a0HcNceuwoizdsP/Ivrg3peC1R4FLTGv3RsspvR7HU1Ym5+v/TL7VuPpHrM3WwbpTe 3N37YfEOpN5Z9FuixclmYFFDhIdBO02Gf7vqXU2dRVypGOPjKLpCG+GpBUHXdUlRlFxV 1DcK0pQmzlYi9ZYVcJEARxKdiHmEj1XftPk53geH/UwsqMjMQ7oV58xBHfGmtkBmkERv PLLXh97sOqDHcJJ+Hcf8CDi8KpA/Whj/LxwH7AKcDdEUpberzDgComD4yTaka7tjqI0n Tb9r5SAmgwMJVqqS3JBrjqPHkR2OZO5r6qYl29HwHKmt/jy4mIsDyaXZXWcxvhNPhvRK N+Aw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAcm5jXs6f0VJnPnDe7OrrVxPKswVw9a4KBxRvXcl2LSnvzX5xv T9sbyH9CxU22nuHCT1sjDkI/4HZ1WA== X-Received: by 10.159.41.66 with SMTP id t60mr5002426uat.35.1494694373989; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.48.200 with HTTP; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <08ca9667-0844-13a9-890b-a2c7092e060a@pobox.com> References: <49e81c0b-07a4-22df-d7c3-2439177ac7cf@pobox.com> <08ca9667-0844-13a9-890b-a2c7092e060a@pobox.com> From: Uros Bizjak Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 18:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues To: Daniel Santos Cc: gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg01100.txt.bz2 On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Daniel Santos wrote: > Ping? I have posted revisions of the following in patch set: > > 05/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01442.html > 09/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00348.html > 11/12 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00350.html > > I have retested them on Linux x86-64 in addition a Wine testsuite comparison > resulting in fewer failed tests (31) than when using unpatched 7.1.0 (78) > and 5.4.0 (78). A cursory examination of the now working failures with > 7.1.0 seemed to be to be due to race conditions in Wine that are > incidentally hidden after the patches. > > Is there anything else needed before we can commit these? They still rebase > cleanly onto the HEAD, but I can repost as "v5" if you prefer. Please go ahead and commit the patches. However, please stay around to fix possible fallout. As said - you are touching quite complex part of the compiler ... Thanks, Uros.