From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-494073-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 126547 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2019 15:14:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 126534 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2019 15:14:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:557, xiao
X-HELO: mail-it1-f193.google.com
Received: from mail-it1-f193.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f193.google.com) (209.85.166.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:14:18 +0000
Received: by mail-it1-f193.google.com with SMTP id p197so4823259itp.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:14:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=GNO3z1zuc2zp/hqUcQJEshw3qX7LZ0TMiCXjcG0c7Dk=;        b=KaClk/1qnl8FRcaVL4kos0UQqjrMZqvVV0VI6SXJXyg3lJljkWojcWL7aW10Snp213         Z65bGQ9WjCNWgTSaeZTtjn9MFQ7QKX3amKCb/ZrZfOGN05mIfSvjDBPZ7/I3LdAn0AbC         vjnGp2i3xDN3wUkrrLP5QQ/sXbAUYo+5t3zgctVATDfMdoM4fV5w8iBRyTPaDbJ4OktR         8ni63cXro0oEpHpmG41C6sX44Kj2cZ5Grviv9UGtuWj7i4CaCvh53PBAr6Vy02S2I0v+         ew9ZxAZ1AMTTe/8u4TtC7hXLzvBAKDVI4BSDTxdZ5kwEciK6TrbmtOvUDM6oJ303odU0         izcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHFC=N=eTMgfHWL7fAkbeC6EChPj3q=UA9_Csro9e-Ju1zoThQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHFC=N=eTMgfHWL7fAkbeC6EChPj3q=UA9_Csro9e-Ju1zoThQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:14:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4bPwAVCAmWKXFt1m6GZcFxt+BAAF8V1sUZeEnPFbDku7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Revert patches to fix PR target/88794
To: Wei Xiao <wei.william.xiao@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>, 	"H. J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, kretz@kde.org, "Guo, Xuepeng" <xuepeng.guo@intel.com>, 	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00842.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:40 PM Wei Xiao <wei.william.xiao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It turns out that the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer
> Manuals (SDM) description about the fixupimm intrinsic is incorrect. So we need
> to revert 3 patches related to it: r265827, r266026 and r267160.
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> Is it ok?

Yes, but please test the compiler after the revert. Please also create
a runtime testcase out of the testcase in the PR.

Thanks,
Uros.

> Wei