From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [x86 PATCH] Fix issue with x86_64_const_vector_operand predicate.
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 08:07:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4bqBOatbvy9giMMCiqnDf1f68-cxMTXGZPmawSME_f1fg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008201d8990c$8ce7ac00$a6b70400$@nextmovesoftware.com>
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 2:06 PM Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
>
>
> This patch fixes (what I believe is) a latent bug in i386.md's
> x86_64_const_vector_operand define_predicate. According to the
> documentation, when a predicate is called with rtx operand OP and
> machine_mode operand MODE, we can't shouldn't assume that the
> MODE is (or has been checked to be) GET_MODE (OP).
>
> The failure mode is that recog can call x86_64_const_vector_operand
> on an arbitrary CONST_VECTOR passing a MODE of V2QI_mode, but when
> the CONST_VECTOR is in fact V1TImode, it's unsafe to directly call
> ix86_convert_const_vector_to_integer, which assumes that the CONST_VECTOR
> contains CONST_INTs when it actually contains CONST_WIDE_INTs. The
> checks in this define_predicate need to be testing OP's mode, and
> ideally confirming that this matches the passed in/specified MODE.
>
> This bug is currently latent, but adding an innocent/unrelated
> define_insn, such as "(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))" to
> i386.md can occasionally change the order in which genrecog generates
> its tests, then ICEing during bootstrap due to V1TI CONST_VECTORs.
>
>
> This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> and make -k check, both with and without --target-board=unix{-m32},
> with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
>
> 2022-07-16 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
> * config/i386/predicates.md (x86_64_const_vector_operand):
> Check the operand's mode matches the specified mode argument.
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Roger
> --
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-16 12:06 Roger Sayle
2022-07-18 6:07 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFULd4bqBOatbvy9giMMCiqnDf1f68-cxMTXGZPmawSME_f1fg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).