From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-456062-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 109872 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2017 07:05:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109821 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jun 2017 07:04:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:532
X-HELO: mail-vk0-f46.google.com
Received: from mail-vk0-f46.google.com (HELO mail-vk0-f46.google.com) (209.85.213.46) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:04:57 +0000
Received: by mail-vk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 191so17998101vko.2        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=4MgOW75rfBj0rZkeGODYf9HhUTpH8VvNbIn2fWQ0Dhg=;        b=BjwDNAYh3rbGcGtTP/6XrpBwQzZkVuSAhJXxO4ESEYW+EaV250hJrqTBCvfLyVn7/d         5yB06zMxSr1SVup6nO6ofRhKlVP0szgcWGEXoxZ+euhjznmRhET6P9cuO2uFJeRM87CY         uuoZpyFfSxvf9JmMgKn5cvlARH230QDATKknwIfQ3zg5vhl0Lfwkyh8ttFQ0t5oMj6aE         3DLXhD8cNxmuyyNiWPgscAeMaykfUMuXMl+5n9ZkMC5wuGuKspyqqmemRdX2Z6vmT5Rl         8BTaIue6c6uGbMfK5Q5fb2722fl3EKa+5BowPTTT9BorkChLUKtwpdvdPQ8POK2k497j         6SPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyGXKfl5Hyg0H35UPM7XsTTHZO9A/u9uzT/gJ1emN4ZI+eFg+e4	0HWsBLeHmQ4hw7FzejjgRMPAHSh2rQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.149.215 with SMTP id x206mr3798641vkd.83.1497596700790; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.69.29 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F199572AE@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F19956843@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAMe9rOr_ij4cU+M1RjLA7Um30bpm_cwOrQxnhqQj9_kJpB9taw@mail.gmail.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F199568BF@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAMe9rOpDZRcsFLnTvR9Qt79xZC87cppj6ovUJ3XvWGe-PrUZ_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170612161809.GD2099@tucnak> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F199568EA@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAFiYyc2rgUw4sK3FvzFmmSXwy+cqywoqjWhV18jUhSSjdkah7g@mail.gmail.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F19956B03@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <CAFULd4ZXXYbPjgoO1_QY-Z+uuszMJfg=ZyF6GX2kZsrfXGVFuw@mail.gmail.com> <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F199572AE@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 07:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFULd4bt0eYwfnCgeETCymgG0U=77pqchWVH2Adx9wLCoKZrWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][X86] Fix rounding pattern similar to PR73350
To: "Koval, Julia" <julia.koval@intel.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, 	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg01157.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Koval, Julia <julia.koval@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This test hangs on avx512er, maybe that's why:
>> According to POSIX, the behavior of a process is undefined after it ignores a SIGFPE, SIGILL, or SIGSEGV signal that was not generated by kill(2) or raise(3).
>
> And volatile make it work even without a patch(r1 and r2 are not combined then).
>
> Added other changes.

The testcase LGTM. I'll leave the final approval to Kirill.

Uros.