public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: josmyers@redhat.com, siddhesh@gotplt.org, uecker@tugraz.at,
	 keescook@chromium.org, isanbard@gmail.com,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in builtin object size.
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 09:39:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc01MwvVDjamr7N3DnyiJ9WTzMxRgkR6JA4S6uUSNXgteQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412135430.4122328-4-qing.zhao@oracle.com>

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 3:54 PM Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com> wrote:
>

I have no comments here, if Siddesh is OK with this I approve.

> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * tree-object-size.cc (access_with_size_object_size): New function.
>         (call_object_size): Call the new function.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-common.h: Add a new macro EXPECT.
>         * gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-3.c: New test.
>         * gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-4.c: New test.
>         * gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-5.c: New test.
> ---
>  .../gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-common.h       |  11 ++
>  .../gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-3.c          |  63 +++++++
>  .../gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-4.c          | 178 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-5.c          |  48 +++++
>  gcc/tree-object-size.cc                       |  60 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-3.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-4.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-5.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-common.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-common.h
> index 66ff7cdd953a..b677067c6e6b 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-common.h
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-common.h
> @@ -30,3 +30,14 @@ unsigned nfails = 0;
>        __builtin_abort ();                                                    \
>      return 0;                                                                \
>    } while (0)
> +
> +#define EXPECT(p, _v) do {                                                   \
> +  size_t v = _v;                                                             \
> +  if (p == v)                                                                \
> +    __builtin_printf ("ok:  %s == %zd\n", #p, p);                            \
> +  else                                                                       \
> +    {                                                                        \
> +      __builtin_printf ("WAT: %s == %zd (expected %zd)\n", #p, p, v);        \
> +      FAIL ();                                                               \
> +    }                                                                        \
> +} while (0);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..78f50230e891
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
> +/* Test the attribute counted_by and its usage in
> + * __builtin_dynamic_object_size.  */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +#include "builtin-object-size-common.h"
> +
> +struct flex {
> +  int b;
> +  int c[];
> +} *array_flex;
> +
> +struct annotated {
> +  int b;
> +  int c[] __attribute__ ((counted_by (b)));
> +} *array_annotated;
> +
> +struct nested_annotated {
> +  struct {
> +    union {
> +      int b;
> +      float f;
> +    };
> +    int n;
> +  };
> +  int c[] __attribute__ ((counted_by (b)));
> +} *array_nested_annotated;
> +
> +void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup (int normal_count, int attr_count)
> +{
> +  array_flex
> +    = (struct flex *)malloc (sizeof (struct flex)
> +                            + normal_count *  sizeof (int));
> +  array_flex->b = normal_count;
> +
> +  array_annotated
> +    = (struct annotated *)malloc (sizeof (struct annotated)
> +                                 + attr_count *  sizeof (int));
> +  array_annotated->b = attr_count;
> +
> +  array_nested_annotated
> +    = (struct nested_annotated *)malloc (sizeof (struct nested_annotated)
> +                                        + attr_count *  sizeof (int));
> +  array_nested_annotated->b = attr_count;
> +
> +  return;
> +}
> +
> +void __attribute__((__noinline__)) test ()
> +{
> +    EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(array_flex->c, 1), -1);
> +    EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(array_annotated->c, 1),
> +          array_annotated->b * sizeof (int));
> +    EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(array_nested_annotated->c, 1),
> +          array_nested_annotated->b * sizeof (int));
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +  setup (10,10);
> +  test ();
> +  DONE ();
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-4.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..20103d58ef51
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-4.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
> +/* Test the attribute counted_by and its usage in
> +__builtin_dynamic_object_size: what's the correct behavior when the
> +allocation size mismatched with the value of counted_by attribute?
> +We should always use the latest value that is hold by the counted_by
> +field.  */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -fstrict-flex-arrays=3" } */
> +
> +#include "builtin-object-size-common.h"
> +
> +struct annotated {
> +  size_t foo;
> +  char others;
> +  char array[] __attribute__((counted_by (foo)));
> +};
> +
> +#define noinline __attribute__((__noinline__))
> +#define SIZE_BUMP 10
> +#define MAX(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
> +
> +/* In general, Due to type casting, the type for the pointee of a pointer
> +   does not say anything about the object it points to,
> +   So, __builtin_object_size can not directly use the type of the pointee
> +   to decide the size of the object the pointer points to.
> +
> +   There are only two reliable ways:
> +   A. observed allocations  (call to the allocation functions in the routine)
> +   B. observed accesses     (read or write access to the location of the
> +                             pointer points to)
> +
> +   That provide information about the type/existence of an object at
> +   the corresponding address.
> +
> +   For A, we use the "alloc_size" attribute for the corresponding allocation
> +   functions to determine the object size;
> +   (We treat counted_by attribute the same as the "alloc_size" attribute)
> +
> +   For B, we use the SIZE info of the TYPE attached to the corresponding access.
> +
> +   The only other way in C which ensures that a pointer actually points
> +   to an object of the correct type is 'static':
> +
> +   void foo(struct P *p[static 1]);
> +
> +   See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624814.html
> +   for more details.  */
> +
> +/* In the following function, malloc allocated more space than the value
> +   of counted_by attribute.  Then what's the correct behavior we expect
> +   the __builtin_dynamic_object_size should have for each of the cases?  */
> +
> +static struct annotated * noinline alloc_buf_more (size_t index)
> +{
> +  struct annotated *p;
> +  size_t allocated_size
> +    = MAX (sizeof (struct annotated),
> +          (__builtin_offsetof (struct annotated, array[0])
> +           + (index + SIZE_BUMP) * sizeof (char)));
> +  p = (struct annotated *) malloc (allocated_size);
> +
> +  p->foo = index;
> +
> +  /* When checking the observed access p->array, we have info on both
> +    observered allocation and observed access,
> +    A.1 from observed allocation:
> +       allocated_size - offsetof (struct annotated, array[0])
> +
> +    A.2 from the counted-by attribute:
> +       p->foo * sizeof (char)
> +
> +    We always use the latest value that is hold by the counted-by field.
> +   */
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 0),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 1),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 2),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 3),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  /* When checking the pointer p, we only have info on the observed allocation.
> +    So, the object size info can only been obtained from the call to malloc.
> +    For both MAXIMUM and MINIMUM: A = (index + SIZE_BUMP) * sizeof (char)  */
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 0), allocated_size);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 1), allocated_size);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 2), allocated_size);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 3), allocated_size);
> +  return p;
> +}
> +
> +/* In the following function, malloc allocated less space than the value
> +   of counted_by attribute.  Then what's the correct behavior we expect
> +   the __builtin_dynamic_object_size should have for each of the cases?
> +   NOTE: this is an user error, GCC should issue warnings for such case.
> +   This is a seperate issue we should address later.  */
> +
> +static struct annotated * noinline alloc_buf_less (size_t index)
> +{
> +  struct annotated *p;
> +  size_t allocated_size
> +    = MAX (sizeof (struct annotated),
> +          (__builtin_offsetof (struct annotated, array[0])
> +           + (index) * sizeof (char)));
> +  p = (struct annotated *) malloc (allocated_size);
> +
> +  p->foo = index + SIZE_BUMP;
> +
> +  /* When checking the observed access p->array, we have info on both
> +    observered allocation and observed access,
> +    A.1 from observed allocation:
> +       allocated_size - offsetof (struct annotated, array[0])
> +    A.2 from the counted-by attribute:
> +       p->foo * sizeof (char)
> +
> +    We always use the latest value that is hold by the counted-by field.
> +   */
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 0),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 1),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 2),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 3),
> +        (p->foo) * sizeof(char));
> +
> +  /* When checking the pointer p, we only have info on the observed
> +    allocation. So, the object size info can only been obtained from
> +    the call to malloc.  */
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 0), allocated_size);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 1), allocated_size);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 2), allocated_size);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 3), allocated_size);
> +  return p;
> +}
> +
> +int main ()
> +{
> +  struct annotated *p, *q;
> +  p = alloc_buf_more (10);
> +  q = alloc_buf_less (10);
> +
> +  /* When checking the access p->array, we only have info on the counted-by
> +    value.  */
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 0), p->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 1), p->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 2), p->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p->array, 3), p->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  /* When checking the pointer p, we have no observed allocation nor observed
> +    access, therefore, we cannot determine the size info here.  */
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 0), -1);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 1), -1);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 2), 0);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(p, 3), 0);
> +
> +  /* When checking the access p->array, we only have info on the counted-by
> +    value.  */
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q->array, 0), q->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q->array, 1), q->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q->array, 2), q->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q->array, 3), q->foo * sizeof(char));
> +  /* When checking the pointer p, we have no observed allocation nor observed
> +    access, therefore, we cannot determine the size info here.  */
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q, 0), -1);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q, 1), -1);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q, 2), 0);
> +  EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(q, 3), 0);
> +
> +  DONE ();
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-5.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..68f9b0f7c8d2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/flex-array-counted-by-5.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +/* Test the attribute counted_by and its usage in
> + * __builtin_dynamic_object_size: when the counted_by field is negative.  */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +#include "builtin-object-size-common.h"
> +
> +struct annotated {
> +  int b;
> +  int c[] __attribute__ ((counted_by (b)));
> +} *array_annotated;
> +
> +struct nested_annotated {
> +  struct {
> +    union {
> +      int b;
> +      float f;
> +    };
> +    int n;
> +  };
> +  int c[] __attribute__ ((counted_by (b)));
> +} *array_nested_annotated;
> +
> +void __attribute__((__noinline__)) setup (int attr_count)
> +{
> +  array_annotated
> +    = (struct annotated *)malloc (sizeof (struct annotated));
> +  array_annotated->b = attr_count;
> +
> +  array_nested_annotated
> +    = (struct nested_annotated *)malloc (sizeof (struct nested_annotated));
> +  array_nested_annotated->b = attr_count -1;
> +
> +  return;
> +}
> +
> +void __attribute__((__noinline__)) test ()
> +{
> +    EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(array_annotated->c, 1), 0);
> +    EXPECT(__builtin_dynamic_object_size(array_nested_annotated->c, 1), 0);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +  setup (-10);
> +  test ();
> +  DONE ();
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> index 018fbc30cbb6..8de264d1dee2 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>  #include "attribs.h"
>  #include "builtins.h"
>  #include "gimplify-me.h"
> +#include "gimplify.h"
>
>  struct object_size_info
>  {
> @@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ static tree compute_object_offset (tree, const_tree);
>  static bool addr_object_size (struct object_size_info *,
>                               const_tree, int, tree *, tree *t = NULL);
>  static tree alloc_object_size (const gcall *, int);
> +static tree access_with_size_object_size (const gcall *, int);
>  static tree pass_through_call (const gcall *);
>  static void collect_object_sizes_for (struct object_size_info *, tree);
>  static void expr_object_size (struct object_size_info *, tree, tree);
> @@ -749,6 +751,60 @@ addr_object_size (struct object_size_info *osi, const_tree ptr,
>    return false;
>  }
>
> +/* Compute __builtin_object_size for a CALL to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE,
> +   OBJECT_SIZE_TYPE is the second argument from __builtin_object_size.
> +   The 2nd, 3rd, and the 4th parameters of the call determine the size of
> +   the CALL:
> +
> +   2nd argument REF_TO_SIZE: The reference to the size of the object,
> +   3rd argument CLASS_OF_SIZE: The size referenced by the REF_TO_SIZE represents
> +     0: the number of bytes;
> +     1: the number of the elements of the object type;
> +   4th argument TYPE_OF_SIZE: A constant 0 with its TYPE being the same as the TYPE
> +    of the object referenced by REF_TO_SIZE
> +
> +   The size of the element can be retrived from the result type of the call,
> +   which is the pointer to the array type.  */
> +static tree
> +access_with_size_object_size (const gcall *call, int object_size_type)
> +{
> +  /* If not for dynamic object size, return.  */
> +  if ((object_size_type & OST_DYNAMIC) == 0)
> +    return size_unknown (object_size_type);
> +
> +  gcc_assert (gimple_call_internal_p (call, IFN_ACCESS_WITH_SIZE));
> +  /* Result type is a pointer type to the original flexible array type.  */
> +  tree result_type = gimple_call_return_type (call);
> +  gcc_assert (POINTER_TYPE_P (result_type));
> +  tree element_size = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (result_type)));
> +  tree ref_to_size = gimple_call_arg (call, 1);
> +  unsigned int class_of_size = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (call, 2));
> +  tree type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_call_arg (call, 3));
> +
> +  tree size = fold_build2 (MEM_REF, type, ref_to_size,
> +                          build_int_cst (ptr_type_node, 0));
> +
> +  /* If size is negative value, treat it as zero.  */
> +  if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
> +  {
> +    tree cond_expr = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
> +                                 unshare_expr (size), build_zero_cst (type));
> +    size = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, integer_type_node, cond_expr,
> +                       build_zero_cst (type), size);
> +  }
> +
> +  if (class_of_size == 1)
> +    size = size_binop (MULT_EXPR,
> +                      fold_convert (sizetype, size),
> +                      fold_convert (sizetype, element_size));
> +  else
> +    size = fold_convert (sizetype, size);
> +
> +  if (!todo)
> +    todo = TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals;
> +
> +  return size;
> +}
>
>  /* Compute __builtin_object_size for CALL, which is a GIMPLE_CALL.
>     Handles calls to functions declared with attribute alloc_size.
> @@ -1350,8 +1406,12 @@ call_object_size (struct object_size_info *osi, tree ptr, gcall *call)
>
>    bool is_strdup = gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_STRDUP);
>    bool is_strndup = gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_STRNDUP);
> +  bool is_access_with_size
> +        = gimple_call_internal_p (call, IFN_ACCESS_WITH_SIZE);
>    if (is_strdup || is_strndup)
>      bytes = strdup_object_size (call, object_size_type, is_strndup);
> +  else if (is_access_with_size)
> +    bytes = access_with_size_object_size (call, object_size_type);
>    else
>      bytes = alloc_object_size (call, object_size_type);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-28  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-12 13:54 [PATCH v9 0/5] New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-04-12 13:54 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] Provide counted_by attribute to flexible array member field (PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-04-22 20:38   ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-22 21:52     ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-12 13:54 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] Convert references with "counted_by" attributes to/from .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-05-28  7:38   ` Richard Biener
2024-05-28 21:09     ` Qing Zhao
2024-05-29  6:57       ` Richard Biener
2024-05-29 13:18         ` Qing Zhao
2024-05-29 19:11       ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-12 13:54 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in builtin object size Qing Zhao
2024-05-28  7:39   ` Richard Biener [this message]
2024-05-28 21:09     ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-12 13:54 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer Qing Zhao
2024-04-12 13:54 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-05-28  7:43   ` Richard Biener
2024-05-28 21:10     ` Qing Zhao
2024-05-29  6:58       ` Richard Biener
2024-04-23 19:56 ` [PATCH v9 0/5] New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-05-07 14:02   ` Ping * 2 " Qing Zhao
2024-05-07 14:14     ` Qing Zhao
2024-05-20 22:31       ` 3rd Ping " Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc01MwvVDjamr7N3DnyiJ9WTzMxRgkR6JA4S6uUSNXgteQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=isanbard@gmail.com \
    --cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).