From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15388 invoked by alias); 24 May 2016 09:01:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15365 invoked by uid 89); 24 May 2016 09:01:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*gerald, marketing, desire X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-lf0-f68.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f68.google.com) (209.85.215.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:01:00 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 65so694717lfq.1; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:00:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=QJKJWfLgcMHkberEnBkU9Zol9LmC+mJL8cecVz5lZcY=; b=A7j6mRUzMBbNE/wTbMkKM8WOBt5buqx+SgRj8vkGhV25gKveUI5tr+8/kglVg9dbFu 1PcjpLWc6asr1Sybmq3m2EDHIgfx2qEdS7sVCGnyyD6excA1OUphcYZ+fyZg5uyAbaVj BYHv1N8Tw2R4BNKSLhhe9r9X4gho2ymuGhZ1dwnprh+5BGsi3zOJbKdnPVCDVIgpR7ow rD6/3+XMLZI+MiNb6ltj6fDiLsGL9WAn8DA3aNvLvaSUMEdKfmpbu9sNrFLCwf913G3J Q2lJ0fjbpjE1/tEuhO7BRs7wH7kcNXLpF6LSb+ow7r2NftuxXKH39ixiGAko064Kz2bH oPlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI0xCcrAJrhpcfjssr42noicfyij2QYeTdj8sEp8Jn2dmVn3jxUrxaf5s4FxjYirmYHpAVMNuXx1LPxWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.24.38 with SMTP id r6mr2934523wjf.88.1464080456481; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.87.34 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:00:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5742CA86.10200@foss.arm.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch wwwdocs] Add aarch64-none-linux-gnu as a primary platform for GCC-7 From: Richard Biener To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan , Andreas Tobler , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01870.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016, Richard Biener wrote: >> So I propose to demote -freebsd to secondary and use >> i686-unknown-freebsd (or x86_64-unknown-freebsd?). >> >> Gerald, Andreas, can you comment on both issues? Esp. i386 >> is putting quite some burden on libstdc++ and atomics support >> for example. > > As Jeff noted, i386 actually is the "marketing" name used for the > platform, GCC has been defaulting to i486 for ages, and I upgraded > to i586 last year: > > 2015-11-15 Gerald Pfeifer > > * config/i386/freebsd.h (SUBTARGET32_DEFAULT_CPU): Change to i586. > Remove support for FreeBSD 5 and earlier. > > And, yes, the system compiler on current versions of FreeBSD is > LLVM (for most platforms including x86). There is still a fair > user base, though. > > Given the above, do you still see a desire to make this change? Can we update to a non-marketing name then, like i586-unknown-freebsd please? config.gcc accepts i[34567]86-*-freebsd*. It at least confused me. Richard. > Gerald