From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-467634-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 89254 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2017 09:05:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89040 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2017 09:05:34 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-wm0-f41.google.com
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:05:33 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r68so8625293wmr.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:05:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=rmvUdU3yBCMTpYwoZnj4Pji8MmUTXjyCM3MVz8gY7xU=;        b=isAOsfxNG38fXW+DBO8vNBw6+iVh15us5YedDM2RxnDaq7+wQ00LZYADVb8qLx1F6U         Z4wWLYXmIyqAWpZUUVoFj6yApq0fIjom11hUxo86BmLA4PJ7qJJlvogAQDfHkvFNaCVj         ddKf0Vtugd1mB32rYVDRMfFiIXZWaFQLYCMBTBRoVSlIUgofysdWUhXFAuxcLyhORLJo         kf6NBSvkPiruOCAtTb2jfwhch4utzZxepKN8XVGQl/amOsgAps+W0ZN1V8MRH/Ai4hLh         iat42Upkbm/YgdXP7Z/lF0wSXyBNkRjK1JNnmMeuUxM8GA93XpSd85NaZK1F5Wr05x0T         zX7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7I4K66Umojwa8vtiWrTjHV2KpQ4xpuPvfcQ8DAQeWreQ0+hPvN	FQye3+DufA3v5wbeBkNHb1Ml5eXG7KT6Ht6sVzs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYSmOb0HPr7Uf95jYwXQFF2hLnP/Ri63rLhy/FN78Qf2KNiLNaUpvDxtGgNHAPRY3aywusWkqF7prVuk1p6n5I=
X-Received: by 10.80.144.168 with SMTP id c37mr29188068eda.182.1511341530976; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:05:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.143.34 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:05:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1711220954340.12252@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
References: <d430e94b-5ea6-0c5c-0dfc-a09e62e0fcbd@suse.cz> <20170920081519.GU1701@tucnak> <d7a78f76-ab66-09ed-06da-257038bc58bb@suse.cz> <7cff6742-bd7a-5ea2-80fb-aca74610f591@suse.cz> <7e976ae2-4aab-9abd-1990-94b9804db8f9@redhat.com> <87d09716-916c-974f-9a4e-7fa95f6b97c3@suse.cz> <20171121232720.GD14653@tucnak> <20171122003015.GE14653@tucnak> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1711220954340.12252@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 09:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc0D64PY9p5aCds6hxTRXe0FYB6cVtivvsOCp3=MJfaWTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix i?86 bootstrap (PR rtl-optimization/82044)
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg01977.txt.bz2

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:27:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > The following patch fixes those two issues and adds similar overflow
>> > check to record_store too (in that spot width is always non-negative, so
>> > we don't need a special width == -1 handling).
>> >
>> > Bootstrapped successfully on i686-linux, ok for trunk if it passes regtest
>> > there (and pending x86_64-linux bootstrap + regtest)?
>>
>> Now successfully bootstrapped/regtested on both.
>
> Ok.

I've reverted the patch on the branch.  This isn't stuff we should
backport IMHO.

Richard.

> Richard.