From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4446 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2015 13:13:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4436 invoked by uid 89); 6 Nov 2015 13:13:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yk0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-yk0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-yk0-f178.google.com) (209.85.160.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:13:21 +0000 Received: by ykdv3 with SMTP id v3so93234374ykd.0 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 05:13:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.70.65 with SMTP id t62mr10902980ywa.240.1446815599970; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 05:13:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.93.11 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 05:13:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <563C6E86.6040808@suse.cz> References: <563C6E86.6040808@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR ipa/68035 From: Richard Biener To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= Cc: GCC Patches , Jan Hubicka Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00623.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote: > Hello. > > Following patch triggers hash calculation of items (functions and variabl= es) > in situations where LTO mode is not utilized. > > Patch survives regression tests and bootstraps on x86_64-linux-pc. Why does that make a difference? Do we have direct ->hash users that should have used get_hash ()? > Ready for trunk? > Thanks, > Martin