public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [C PATCH, committed] Use protected_set_expr_location more
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc0W_enhP1KJM9vVLccG7hZ7mnH+TbGXeyLBrDiO+F=zCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006172959.GT6184@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch makes the C FE use the protected_set_expr_location helper
> where appropriate.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.
>
> 2015-10-06  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
>
>         * c-parser.c (c_parser_statement_after_labels): Use
>         protected_set_expr_location.
>         (c_parser_omp_clause_num_gangs): Likewise.
>         (c_parser_omp_clause_num_threads): Likewise.
>         (c_parser_omp_clause_num_workers): Likewise.
>         (c_parser_omp_clause_vector_length): Likewise.
>         (c_parser_omp_clause_num_teams): Likewise.
>         (c_parser_omp_clause_thread_limit): Likewise.
>         * c-typeck.c (build_c_cast): Likewise.
>         (c_cast_expr): Likewise.
>
> diff --git gcc/c/c-parser.c gcc/c/c-parser.c
> index 0df7d7b..2d24c21 100644
> --- gcc/c/c-parser.c
> +++ gcc/c/c-parser.c
> @@ -5141,9 +5141,8 @@ c_parser_statement_after_labels (c_parser *parser, vec<tree> *chain)
>       (recursively) all of the component statements should already have
>       line numbers assigned.  ??? Can we discard no-op statements
>       earlier?  */
> -  if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (stmt)
> -      && EXPR_LOCATION (stmt) == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
> -    SET_EXPR_LOCATION (stmt, loc);
> +  if (EXPR_LOCATION (stmt) == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
> +    protected_set_expr_location (stmt, loc);

This one doesn't look like an improvement though as EXPR_LOCATION tests
CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P and returns UNKNOWN_LOCATION if not.

>
>    parser->in_if_block = in_if_block;
>  }
> @@ -10681,8 +10680,7 @@ c_parser_omp_clause_num_gangs (c_parser *parser, tree list)
>        /* Attempt to statically determine when the number isn't positive.  */
>        c = fold_build2_loc (expr_loc, LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
>                        build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (t), 0));
> -      if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (c))
> -       SET_EXPR_LOCATION (c, expr_loc);
> +      protected_set_expr_location (c, expr_loc);
>        if (c == boolean_true_node)
>         {
>           warning_at (expr_loc, 0,
> @@ -10726,8 +10724,7 @@ c_parser_omp_clause_num_threads (c_parser *parser, tree list)
>        /* Attempt to statically determine when the number isn't positive.  */
>        c = fold_build2_loc (expr_loc, LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
>                        build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (t), 0));
> -      if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (c))
> -       SET_EXPR_LOCATION (c, expr_loc);
> +      protected_set_expr_location (c, expr_loc);
>        if (c == boolean_true_node)
>         {
>           warning_at (expr_loc, 0,
> @@ -10771,8 +10768,7 @@ c_parser_omp_clause_num_workers (c_parser *parser, tree list)
>        /* Attempt to statically determine when the number isn't positive.  */
>        c = fold_build2_loc (expr_loc, LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
>                        build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (t), 0));
> -      if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (c))
> -       SET_EXPR_LOCATION (c, expr_loc);
> +      protected_set_expr_location (c, expr_loc);
>        if (c == boolean_true_node)
>         {
>           warning_at (expr_loc, 0,
> @@ -11116,8 +11112,7 @@ c_parser_omp_clause_vector_length (c_parser *parser, tree list)
>        /* Attempt to statically determine when the number isn't positive.  */
>        c = fold_build2_loc (expr_loc, LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
>                        build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (t), 0));
> -      if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (c))
> -       SET_EXPR_LOCATION (c, expr_loc);
> +      protected_set_expr_location (c, expr_loc);
>        if (c == boolean_true_node)
>         {
>           warning_at (expr_loc, 0,
> @@ -11193,8 +11188,7 @@ c_parser_omp_clause_num_teams (c_parser *parser, tree list)
>        /* Attempt to statically determine when the number isn't positive.  */
>        c = fold_build2_loc (expr_loc, LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
>                            build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (t), 0));
> -      if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (c))
> -       SET_EXPR_LOCATION (c, expr_loc);
> +      protected_set_expr_location (c, expr_loc);
>        if (c == boolean_true_node)
>         {
>           warning_at (expr_loc, 0, "%<num_teams%> value must be positive");
> @@ -11237,8 +11231,7 @@ c_parser_omp_clause_thread_limit (c_parser *parser, tree list)
>        /* Attempt to statically determine when the number isn't positive.  */
>        c = fold_build2_loc (expr_loc, LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
>                            build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (t), 0));
> -      if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (c))
> -       SET_EXPR_LOCATION (c, expr_loc);
> +      protected_set_expr_location (c, expr_loc);
>        if (c == boolean_true_node)
>         {
>           warning_at (expr_loc, 0, "%<thread_limit%> value must be positive");
> diff --git gcc/c/c-typeck.c gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> index 10cad36..df3245a4 100644
> --- gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> +++ gcc/c/c-typeck.c
> @@ -5216,8 +5216,7 @@ build_c_cast (location_t loc, tree type, tree expr)
>                || TREE_CODE (expr) == COMPLEX_CST)))
>        value = build1 (NOP_EXPR, type, value);
>
> -  if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (value))
> -    SET_EXPR_LOCATION (value, loc);
> +  protected_set_expr_location (value, loc);
>    return value;
>  }
>
> @@ -5255,8 +5254,8 @@ c_cast_expr (location_t loc, struct c_type_name *type_name, tree expr)
>        SET_EXPR_LOCATION (ret, loc);
>      }
>
> -  if (CAN_HAVE_LOCATION_P (ret) && !EXPR_HAS_LOCATION (ret))
> -    SET_EXPR_LOCATION (ret, loc);
> +  if (!EXPR_HAS_LOCATION (ret))
> +    protected_set_expr_location (ret, loc);
>
>    /* C++ does not permits types to be defined in a cast, but it
>       allows references to incomplete types.  */
>
>         Marek

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-07  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-06 17:30 Marek Polacek
2015-10-07  8:14 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2015-10-07 11:02   ` Marek Polacek
2015-10-07 13:59     ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFiYyc0W_enhP1KJM9vVLccG7hZ7mnH+TbGXeyLBrDiO+F=zCw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=polacek@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).