From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17317 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2013 12:57:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 17309 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2013 12:57:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:57:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm6so10873471wib.3 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:57:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.79.37 with SMTP id g5mr75072930wix.8.1357217840265; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.179.130 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:57:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130103123736.GF12999@adacore.com> References: <1357216224-513-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20130103123736.GF12999@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFA] statement before variable declaration in cp_parser_initializer_list. From: Richard Biener To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> > Tested against x86_64-linux, no regression. >> > OK to commit? (obvious?) >> >> Hmm? We compile with a C++ compiler where this is perfectly valid ... > > I was compiling with GCC 4.7 where it gave me a warning... I don't know > much about C++ anymore, so I didn't know. Oh well! Ah, for the 4.7 branch yes. Thanks, Richard. > -- > Joel