From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [tree-optimization/63387] Recognize isunordered
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc0_a5WaZ_A6Yh+0R-rarwNxS+nPWYfSuk15fMwWL2Z1pg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504132328460.14049@stedding.saclay.inria.fr>
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> just a simple pattern for match.pd. I am ignoring the issue of whether
>>>> isnan
>>>> is the same as isunordered, I am only combining isunordered together.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok.
>>
>>
>> Oups, I am an idiot. My own comment in bugzilla shows why the patch has a
>> bug, I'll post a fixed version soon. Sorry,
>
>
> Here is the fixed patch (same ChangeLog).
>
> I copied the type compatibility check from other places in match.pd, it
> would be a good idea to provide a helper to avoid repeating this code.
Agreed and on my list of cleanups ...
> Is the new version ok?
Ok if bootstrapped / tested.
Thanks,
Richard.
> --
> Marc Glisse
> Index: gcc/match.pd
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/match.pd (revision 222062)
> +++ gcc/match.pd (working copy)
> @@ -925,20 +925,29 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
> (ncmp @0 @1)))))
> (simplify
> (bit_xor (cmp @0 @1) integer_truep)
> (with { enum tree_code ic = invert_tree_comparison
> (cmp, HONOR_NANS (@0)); }
> (if (ic == icmp)
> (icmp @0 @1))
> (if (ic == ncmp)
> (ncmp @0 @1)))))
>
> +/* Unordered tests if either argument is a NaN. */
> +(simplify
> + (bit_ior (unordered @0 @0) (unordered @1 @1))
> + (if ((GIMPLE && types_compatible_p (TREE_TYPE (@0), TREE_TYPE (@1)))
> + || (GENERIC && TREE_TYPE (@0) == TREE_TYPE (@1)))
> + (unordered @0 @1)))
> +(simplify
> + (bit_ior:c (unordered @0 @0) (unordered:c@2 @0 @1))
> + @2)
>
> /* Simplification of math builtins. */
>
> (define_operator_list LOG BUILT_IN_LOGF BUILT_IN_LOG BUILT_IN_LOGL)
> (define_operator_list EXP BUILT_IN_EXPF BUILT_IN_EXP BUILT_IN_EXPL)
> (define_operator_list LOG2 BUILT_IN_LOG2F BUILT_IN_LOG2 BUILT_IN_LOG2L)
> (define_operator_list EXP2 BUILT_IN_EXP2F BUILT_IN_EXP2 BUILT_IN_EXP2L)
> (define_operator_list LOG10 BUILT_IN_LOG10F BUILT_IN_LOG10 BUILT_IN_LOG10L)
> (define_operator_list EXP10 BUILT_IN_EXP10F BUILT_IN_EXP10 BUILT_IN_EXP10L)
> (define_operator_list POW BUILT_IN_POWF BUILT_IN_POW BUILT_IN_POWL)
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63387.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63387.c (revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63387.c (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +
> +int f(double aaa, double bbb){
> + int xa = __builtin_isunordered(aaa, aaa);
> + int xb = __builtin_isunordered(bbb, bbb);
> + return xa | xb;
> +}
> +
> +int g(double aaa, double bbb){
> + int xa = __builtin_isunordered(aaa, bbb);
> + int xb = __builtin_isunordered(bbb, bbb);
> + return xa | xb;
> +}
> +
> +int h(double ccc, float ddd){
> + int xc = __builtin_isunordered(ccc, ccc);
> + int xd = __builtin_isunordered(ddd, ddd);
> + return xc | xd;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "aaa\[^\n\r\]* unord aaa" "optimized" }
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "bbb\[^\n\r\]* unord bbb" "optimized" }
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "aaa\[^\n\r\]* unord bbb" 2
> "optimized" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "ccc\[^\n\r\]* unord ddd" "optimized" }
> } */
> +/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-13 12:24 Marc Glisse
2015-04-13 12:36 ` Richard Biener
2015-04-13 13:11 ` Marc Glisse
2015-04-13 21:37 ` Marc Glisse
2015-04-14 8:45 ` Richard Biener [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFiYyc0_a5WaZ_A6Yh+0R-rarwNxS+nPWYfSuk15fMwWL2Z1pg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=marc.glisse@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).